The Thoughts of a alienated father in regards to Parental Alienation and indoctrination
Asking for his child voice -
Part II of the Ontario Break up by Vincent Schiele
How a junkie becomes a millionaire Christine Rupert can huff and puff, but no amount of hot air will ever blow over our determination to report the dark facts about this junkie turned millionaire. Her pathetic attempts to silence the truth are useless. She has done everything in her power to prey... access page ...
How a junkie becomes a millionaire Christine Rupert can huff and puff, but no amount of hot air will ever blow over our determination to report the dark facts about this junkie turned millionaire. Her pathetic attempts to silence the truth are useless. She has done everything in her power to prey upon and destroy an innocent, vulnerable man, and the record of her actions will speak for itself. She is determined to steal everything she possibly can from William Mullins Johnson, a man who has already been devastated – spending 12.5 years in jail, wrongfully convicted of murdering and sodomizing his 3 year old niece. She has already robbed him of much of his restitution money, not to mention his heart and soul.
Christine Rupert’s Bracebridge court file No. FC 13 196, is public record, and it desperately needs to be publicized. It should serve as a warning to other men about manipulative predators like Rupert, a thieving junkie, who have zero concern for the men they harm. Her despicable actions are the sort that drive 8 men to commit suicide each day in Canada, but she couldn’t possibly care less. She just wants the loot, and her next fix.
I attended a Contempt of Court Motion hearing brought on by Christine Rupert against Bill Mullins returnable January 26, 2015, however the hearing was adjourned on consent to Bracebridge Courthouse on February 23, 2015 at 9am. I encourage as many advocates to attend as possible. I then went to ask the clerk about viewing the Rupert vs Mullins Family Court File. I could not see the file, as it was still in the courtroom, I agreed to come back later. I went back the following morning to look at the file, but the clerk said they did not have it. Odd, since I had spoken with court staff the day before and told them to expect me. I asked to speak with the supervisor, Kelly, who was of no help and quite sharp and uncooperative. So I requested to speak with Julie, the secretary of Judge Wood. She too could not tell me where the file was. I was dumbfounded that a Canadian Court would not know where a court file was. How do you lose a file? They said they would call me when the file was located. I told them while they searched, I would contact the Attorney General, to let them know a court had lost an entire file. Of course I wondered if, in fact, staff was deliberately keeping the file from my view, given they had knowledge of Christine Rupert bringing a motion to seal it.
As I was about to drive away, the court called me and said that they had found the file. Imagine that. I was allowed to view it and make copies of all the records therein. It seems Christine Rupert has been working on a motion to have the file sealed, but she was too late and too slow. She apparently failed to realize that anyone could access that file at any time – it’s a public record.
Since I wrote about Christine Rupert and Bill Mullins nearly a year ago, I have been threatened with a number of legal actions against me, for writing the facts as revealed by meticulous research. Rupert refused to talk with me, though I wanted to include her side of the story. Instead, I got her side in file disclosure at the Bracebridge Courthouse. At a glance, it illustrated the modus operandi of a druggie who made Mr. Mullins her mark. A junkie will do anything for her fix without a care for those she harms. This is the mentality of Christine Rupert. Bill Mullins was at the wrong place at the wrong time. He became, and continues to be, a victim of Christine Rupert’s scam.
Click the image for a audio phone recording attached to this article
Christine Rupert lost her children because of her drug use and drug dealing in Kitchener; this was confirmed to me by a friend who felt the CAS was correct in apprehending her children. While usually I do not agree with Children’s Aid taking children, in this case they were in the right to take the children from a bad mother, who’s primary concern was drugs instead of her children. It was further communicated to me that Rupert sold drugs to pay the cost of lawyer’s fees to get her children back. She often joined up with Canada Court Watch to protest against CAS and this is where she learned how to manipulate the system. When Bill Mullins came along, she found the perfect target. Bill who had just spent a dozen years in jail for a crime that never happened, was eager to settle down with a woman. Unfortunately he settled down with a conniving greedy addict.
Mr. Mullins called me about two years ago,frustrated, nervous and scared. He did not know how to deal with Christine Rupert, who started an action against him in Family Court, on the day, or day after, the required time to for the law to deem them common law. She finally won her lottery, the divorce lottery, and the jackpot was the settlement paid to Bill for his 12.5 years of suffering. You read that right. Bill Mullins spent much of his adult life behind bars, and Christine Rupert is attempting to rob him of his compensation. Her method is simple and predictable: Step one, get a restraining order. Step two, tell the police she’s afraid and fears for her life. Step three, file an application in Family Court and tell the court how badly Bill treated her and how scared of him she is. Cry crocodile tears and play the sympathy card while the Toronto Star paints her as a victim.
I spoke with Bill a lot, hundreds of hours, with thousands of emails exchanged. And I listened to him. About his abuse in jail, about feeling hopeless, about the horrors he experienced and witnessed in jail. Bill told me about the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted (AIDWYC), and how he was vindicated by James Lockyer, one of the founding members of AIDWYC, Toronto. The taxpayers of Ontario paid Bill Mullins $4.25 million dollars for his wrongful conviction. One million went to the lawyer that obtained that restitution and the rest is all he has. It’s not an income earned through work, not a lottery winning, not an inheritance, but a sum to offset the horror he endured spending 12.5 years in jail, in some of the worst possible conditions, branded the worst type of criminal – a child murderer and a child rapist. Bill’s nightmare had finally ended – until Christine Rupert came along. A blood sucking leech who did not care about Bill, Rupert spent the next three years waiting to enact her scam.
This junkie’s actions and deceit have further devastated Bill Mullins, and even worse, she’s trying to silence him and hide the truth from public view, all using his money. Formerly a slum dwelling, drugged out deadbeat mom, Rupert has “won” two houses from Mullins, along with a great deal of cash, and it’s still not enough for her. She has also sued him for trying to tell this story, and won again – over $75,000. She has also threatened to sue me for telling this story. If she could I’m sure she’d sue A Voice for Men. But she can’t. Christine Rupert’s days of “winning” are about to end. She will not silence Bill Mullins, she will not silence me, and she will not silence AVfM. We will continue to expose the details of her case, and show how easily a malicious greedy woman can use the Canadian court system as a weapon to bludgeon an innocent, vulnerable man.
This woman stole one million dollars from a man who spent over 12 years in jail, wrongly convicted of child rape and murder, and on Monday, she wants to put him back in jail so she can take the rest. Let that sink in. Then help us fight her. This cannot happen.
Hi. I have a similar story about a.person by the name of carrie ann...
Audience: Authenticated The modus operandi of a druggie who stole one million dollars from a man who spent over 12 years in jail Invalid access privileges authenticate to see this reply ...
Another reason not to go after compensation money though I agree after 12 years in jail, he certainly deserves compensation! Certainly a lesson on getting into a relationship with a woman after all that I hope she is not successful in stealing more
Thank you for sending this. I'm in similar circumstances with a pathological lying step daughter and her alcoholic mother. Not as bad as below. Her Mother and the step daughter has accused me of abuse. Just because I've finally gave this child boundaries. I hate the ...
THIS IS THE VOICE (ON TAPE) OF CATHERINE FREI...THE CYBER FREAK THAT WAS AFTER ME...SHE WAS IN MY GROUP SHE WAS POSTING ON MOTHERISK....!!! SHE IS RATTING OUT HER FRIEND CHRISTINE Christine Rupert lost her children because of her drug use and drug dealing in Kit...
Bill a nice sweet man who gets taken advantage from by Police, his life taken away by lies. Now a con-artist who needs money to support her drug habit takes advantage of a naive man. The Ontario justice system is a joke to allow this, yet endorse it and award Christi...
this is my friend he was very good to this woman,he gaved her anything that she wanted,even a brand new truck,now look what she did to him,well that is one thing that wont happen to me.i am a step ahead of everyone and anyone..billy remember I told you so never let a...
Mr. Romeo Phillion upset and outspoken concerning his friend William Mullins-Johnson latest abuse by the Justice system. Judge Thomas Wood from Bracebridge, Ontario Canada who has allowed Mullins ex common law partner to take from his structured settlement.
Christine Rupert, In Ontario Canada. Took advantage of a vulnerable man who spent 12 years in prison wrongfully convicted. He comes out of prison/most time in solitary confinement and meets a snake dressed in sheep's clothing.
I am making this Motion to have William Mullins Johnson found in contempt of his obligations under two separate Court Orders; one made June 18,2014, by The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden, and one made October 20,2014, by The Honourable Justice T.M. Wood
I am making this Motion to have William Mullins Johnson found in contempt of his obligations under two separate Court Orders; one made June 18,2014, by The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden, and one made October 20,2014, by The Honourable Justice T.M. Wood
I am making this Motion to have William Mullins Johnson found in contempt of his obligations under two separate Court Orders; one made June 18,2014, by The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden, and one made October 20,2014, by The Honourable Justice T.M. Wood
2. This Family Law Application was settled by execution of Final Minutes of Settlement at the Settlement Conference held before The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood on October 20,2014. A copy of the Final Order of His Honour Mr. Justice Wood is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A" to this my Affidavit.
3. The Final Order requires at paragraphs 6 and 7: u 6. William Mullins Johnson shall not communicate directly, or indirectly, with Christine Rupert, nor attend within 500 metres of her place of employment or residence.
7. William Mullins Johnson shall comply with all terms of the Order of Justice Howden dated June 18,2014, within 30 days. " The Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden dated June 18, 2014, is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "B" to this my Affidavit.
4. The Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden was made on Consent on June 18, 2014, following a Motion that I made for a finding of William Mullins Johnson in contempt. That Motion was resolved by the Consent Order and with William Mullins Johnson being ordered to pay my costs of that Motion of $4,000.00.
5. The Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden requires the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) "The Respondent shall forthwith delete from YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and any other social media, all videos he has uploaded which violate the terms of the Restraining Order, or in which he discusses the matters at issue in this Court proceeding. The Respondent shall forthwith remove from all social media, including Twittter and Facebook and third party websites all postings he has made which have any reference to Christine Rupert, or the matters at issue in this Court proceeding. The Respondent is restrained from making any further comment, by video or posting, or otherwise, on any public forum regarding Christine Rupert, or the matters at issue in this proceeding. The Respondent shall within 14 days, deliver a copy of this Order on ail third party advocacy groups and print media to whom he has delivered video content which mentions the Applicant, or the matters at issue in this proceeding, and he shall request in writing the removal of the offending content from the third party websites, or other media. The Respondent shall provide proof to Applicant's counsel's that he has delivered the letters to the third party websites and print media." The terms of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden's Order are clear and unequivocal.
6. William Mullins Johnson has failed to comply with the Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood which requires compliance with the Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden and requires removal from social media including Twitter, Facebook, third party web sites, Youtube, all videos and postings he had made to that date which offend the terms of the Restraining Order, or in which he discusses the matters at issue in this Court proceeding, In fact, he has continued to violate the terms of the Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden and has made further defamatory and damaging statements about me on social media, including on Facebook. 7. The Restraining Order refers to an Order made by The Honourable Justice G. M. Mulligan, September 20, 2013, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "C" to this my Affidavit.
The Restraining Order contained the following relevant terms:
(i) William Mullins Johnson shall not contact or communicate directly, or indirectly with Christine Rupert, born April 9,1978, except through and in the presence of counsel. 8. On November 26,2014, my counsel wrote by email to William Mullins Johnson's counsel, Wanda Corston, asking for proof that William Mullins Johnson had complied with all of the terms of the June 18, 2014, Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden, within 30 days of October 20,2074. A copy of my counsel's email to Ms. Corston is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "D" to this my Affidavit.
9. By letter dated November 26,2014, Ms. Corston replied. A copy of her letter with attachments is attached 'lto and marked as Exhibit "E" to this my Affidavit. In Ms. Corston's letter she advised that she had sent a letter and a copy of the Order to two agencies, Aboriginal Legal Services in Toronto and the Assembly of First Nations in Ottawa which were organizations that Mr. Mullins Johnson recalled sending postings to, requesting the removal of any content from third party web sites, or other media where the agency may have posted the videos.
10. By email dated December 4, 2014, my counsel, Donna Macfarlane, forwarded to Ms. Corston and email that I sent to my counsel indicating that Mr. Mullins Johnson had not removed from the Internet, or requested the removal from the Internet, postings made by a men's right advocacy organizations, A Voice For Men. A copy of the email is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "F" to this my Affidavit. 1 1. I am advised by t ry counsel, and believe that Ms. Corston did not provide any response to this communication from Ms. Macfarlane.
12. Ot Monday, December 8,2014, the Toronto Star published an account on its front page of the history of my dealings with CAS. Two of my daughters were taken from my care on the basis of flawed drug tests. The issue of the validity of the drug tests performed by Mother Risk has now been challenged in Court. I and my daughters were victims of these flawed drug tests. A copy of the article published about my case is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "G" to this my Affidavit. Following the publication of the article by the Toronto Star, William Mullins Johnson's friends linked the Voice for Men article about me to it,
13. In addition, William Mullins Johnson began making Facebook postings commenting on the article and making defamatory remarks about me. I reiterate these remarks were made after the date of two Court Orders which are very clear and specific in that they prohibit Mr. Mullins Johnson from making remarks about me over the Internet and requiring him to withdraw all such remarks.
14. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit ((H" is a series of Facebook postings made to William Mullins Johnson's Facebook account, William Mullins Johnson: JUSTICE ENSURED. A friend of William Mullins Johnson, Lisa Rehberg-Ladouceur has posted links to the Toronto Star article and to the article posted by a "Voice for Men.com". Wrongly Convicted William Mullins Johnson files $650,000.00 fraud suit against Christine Rupert". William Mullins Johnson has made a series of comments regarding me in response to these Facebook postings.
The following are excerpts of those comments made:
"I am scared for how future Family court will commence. With this situation with my ex, white women can now, in a most ugly and blatant manner, tell the court that their Aboriginal partner is a murderer because he is Aboriginal. Quite the precedent set down by Family court in Bracebridge and allowed without confrontation by any lawyer I have had throughout. People may think I am "harping" on this, that's ok, but this country has (sic) better destroy the Constitution from 1982 because it is meaningless as it is intended tp (sic) protect all from such racism and discrimination. It protects all, that is unless you are aboriginal.
HAPPY MONDAY PEOPLE!"
"Thins (sic) woman is a liar! I witnessed her use crack cocaine, buy it for us and sell it to me. I also saw this woman cook powder cocaine into crack, and this was in July 2010 - June 20ll . . . . She supplied to me and didn't have any problems doing so. She put in her application to family court she never did drugs ever in her life. Then she tells the Toronto Star that she has done drugs. When I met her, she was not allowed her 8 year old boy without a chaperone, by court order Then again, what does it matter? According to the acceptance of family court of Christine Rupert's claim . . . I am just an Ondian with no rights. That points (sic) has been hammered home thorough (sic) my own lawyer-who aboriginal herself-with no action to counter Christine's claims. Christine did use drugs after 2006 and after 2009. She did them with me."
My photograph from the Toronto Star is reproduced below the comments of William Mullins Johnson.
December 5 at 9:05 "Nothing will ever change in the realm of Family Court. Corruption in all form lives there/it lives in the judge's orders. The lawyers actions and non-actions of the opposing lawyer.opposing lawyer. There is nothing contributing to "family values" of the Family court System in Canada. That arena only works to encourage domestic violence when all possible in order to keep a case in the system for more money and have add to the statistics of domestics violence. I can see why someone wants to a lawyer win family court. You have a licence to destroy lives and have the court protection while you do such things."
A series of comments from other Facebook users are below. After these comments William Mullins Johnson replies to them as follows:
"Interesting that seemingly everyone associated with my Family court Proceeding with her worked to protect this woman from fraud, perjury and practiced racism (close to hate crime). Yet, it was my family and I called murders because we are aboriginal by this woman. Strange how things work out eh?" In the comments below William Mullins Johnson writes: o "hardworking. . ,juggling multiple jobs" my ass.. ..she was on WSIB disability....wonder if she defrauded them too?"
15. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "I" is a copy of a posting dated January 2,2015 @ 1l,34 p.m. made by Attila L. Vinczer who is the key spokesperson for a Voice for Men repeating links to an article that he wrote about me based upon information provided to him by William Mullins Johnson in which he accuses me of fraud. That these articles continue to be disseminated is very concerning to me. The article is full of falsehoods and is libellous in the extreme. William Mullins Johnson has, to the best of my knowledge, not taken any steps to request the removal of the article from the web site, A Voice for Men, despite being specifically asked to do so in correspondence by -y counsel to William Mullins Johnson's lawyer, Wanda Corston. I have personal knowledge that William Mullins Johnson and Attila Vinczer are friends. Mr. Vinczer was even in attendance in Court on June 18114 when Mr. Justice Howden made his Order. Yet William Mullins Johnson took no steps to request removal of this very defamatory article. The article is damaging to my reputation. it has been sent to me by friends who are alarmed when they encounter it on the internet. Some of the comments at the end of the article advocate violence against me. This is very disturbing to me.
16. I reiterate that William Mullins Johnson is not only in breach of the original terms of the Orders of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden and The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood, but he is repeating and extending the breach of the Orders with these new postings.
17. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "J" to this my Affidavit is a DVD which a copy of a YouTube video (although there is sound and no video on this portion) of a talk William Mullins Johnson gave to law clients at the University of Ottawa on September 16, 2074, after the date of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden's Order of June 18,2074. Not only does he discuss the matters at issue in the Court system, he published the talk on September 24,2014, and this portion of the talk, in particular, on youTube. Some of the remarks made in this portion of the talk include: "She's telling Family Court I'm planning to shoot her and my family are giving me guns to do it, and for no other reason than that we are Aboriginal, and the Court's accepted it." "I never made no threat to her." "I knocked on some doors and wrote some letters. I am under threat of a judge for criminal contempt for talking about it." William Mullins Johnson was clearly aware that he was publicly speaking about the matters at issue in this Court proceeding. It was William Mullins Johnson who posted the video to YouTube.
18. I lived in fear during our relationship. We separated as a consequence of the mood swings and outbursts of rage of William Mullins Johnson. His volatility was exacerbated by his use of drugs. Details of the circumstances that lead to our separation, including physical and psychological abuse inflicted upon me by William Mullins Johason, are set out in my Amended Application and my Affidavit dated September 10, 2013, filed in support of a Motion for a Restraining Order. By his blatant disregard and flouting of the very clear terms of the Orders of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden and The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood, it is clear to me that William Mullins Johnson continues to have an unhealthy obsession with me and it leaves me profoundly concerned about my safety and my reputation in the community. By his remarks, William Mullins Johnson is doing serious and long lasting damage to my reputation. 19. Given the viral nature of the Internet and the sheer nastiness of many of William Mullins Johnson's postings, I believe that I may never recover my good reputation in the community.
20. Following the publication of the article in the Toronto Star, the reporter assigned to write the article about my history became very concerned and was asked by the Toronto Star to speak with my counsel. Fellow travellers of William Mullins Johnson posted nasty comments in the comment section of the Toronto Star providing links to the articles in A Voice for Men. The Toronto Star has since had to shut down comments on its site. "
21. William Mullins Johnson "shared" the link to the Toronto Star article to Canada Court Watch, an advocacy group, from his William Mullins Johnson Jutice Ensured Facebook page. This will have the effect of drawing more viewers to the damaging and false comments made by him on his Facebook page, as detailed in paragraph 14 above.
22. Ihave a genuine fear, which I believe is well-founded by the history of this case, that William Mullins Johnson is simply ungovernable, and will not comply with the terms of the Restraining Orders without experiencing significant sanction by This Honourable Court. I am seeking an Order that William Mullins Johnson pay a penalty to me of $25,000.00 for the damage that he has done to my reputation and by reason of his blatant and unremitting contempt for This Honourable Court. I am also seeking an Order that the Court exercise its jurisdiction to require William Mullins Johnson to comply with the Orders of The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood and The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden forthwith, failing which I asked This Honourable Court to exercise the fuIl extent of its jurisdiction to temporarily seize property and/or to fine and imprison William Mullins Johnson for his contempt of this court.
23.The Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden is clear and unequivocal. William Mullins Johnson was presented by counsel when he consented to the terms of the Order. I believe William Mullins Johnson is aware of his obligation under the terms of the Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden. My counsel has written to counsel for William Mullins Johnson seeking compliance with the terms of the Order. Not only has William Mullins Johnson failed to comply with his obligition to remove the social media postings, he has flagrantly, wilfully and knowingly disobeyed the terms of The Honourable Mr. Justice Howden by making further comments after the issuance of the Order of The Honourable Mr. Justice Wood which makes it clear that he has a continuing obligation to refrain from making such postings. In these circumstances, I do not believe that there are any contested facts which would require a triil of this issue.
24. Further, I am seeking my costs of this proceedings to be f,rxed by This Honourable Court, on a full recovery basis.
25' I make this Affidavit in support of my Motion herein and for no other or improper purpose.
Source: Service Ontario Affidavit by Christine Rupert January 15 2015 FC-13-196
AVFM EXCLUSIVE Sault Saint Marie, Ontario, Canada William Mullins-Johnson has filed a $650,000 civil claim against Christine Rupert in Superior Court for fraud. William Mullins-Johnson (who prefers to go by Bill Mullins) was wrongfully convicted of rape and murder in Canada. He spent many years i... access page ...
AVFM EXCLUSIVE Sault Saint Marie, Ontario, Canada William Mullins-Johnson has filed a $650,000 civil claim against Christine Rupert in Superior Court for fraud. William Mullins-Johnson (who prefers to go by Bill Mullins) was wrongfully convicted of rape and murder in Canada. He spent many years in prison. After his release from prison in 2005, but still a convicted felon, Bill moved to Toronto while awaiting appeal of his conviction. He had always maintained his innocence and wanted to be near where the ensuing legal proceedings would be held. His mother left her Sault Saint Marie home to stay with him, acting as his surety so he could stay in Toronto.In 2007 his conviction was finally overturned at the court of appeal. He was truly a free man.
Subsequently, a multi-million dollar award for wrongful conviction was advanced to Mullins in October 2010, creating a major media buzz. To avoid the relentless flurry of media calls, Mullins decided to drive out West for two months with his then-new girlfriend, Christine Rupert. But Bill soon began to believe Christine had a drinking problem. After getting very drunk one night at the Casino, she became belligerent with Bill, who then began to think he wanted no part of a woman like that. He told her to go upstairs and pack her things. Bill drove her to the Vancouver Airport, gave her $700 for a flight back to her home in Kitchener, and broke off the relationship.
The following morning, according to Mullins, Christine begged to come back. She had spent the night at the airport instead of leaving for Kitchener. Bill’s decision to allow her back would eventually prove to have serious consequences.
Christine Rupert-William Mullins June 2012
According to multiple sources, Rupert had begun courting Mr. Mullins in and around the time she knew he was about to receive a $4.25 million dollar settlement for his wrongful conviction and malicious prosecution. The essence of the Mullins Statement of Claim is that Christine Rupert committed fraud from day one to defraud Mullins of his millions. She waited the 3-year period normally establishing common law marriage to occur, then immediately filing her Application in Family Court against Mr. Mullins. There is evidence that she very carefully orchestrated this fraud.
An on-line friendship had fostered between Bill and Christine in the years prior. They eventually met at her home and adjoined with Canada Court Watch advocates to rally against Children’s Aid and Judicial abuse in Canada. Ontario CAS had strongly lobbied for his wrongful conviction. During this time, Christine begged Bill to take her out of Kitchener where she rented a home. She moved in with Bill in August, 2010 in Sault Saint Marie, Ontario.
Using the proceeds of his settlement, Mullins purchased a large 3,500 square foot house in Huntsville, Ontario. The two of them moved into the 42-acre property in Huntsville in April of 2011. This is where Bill thought he would form a family with Christine.
Bill had wanted a camp-site getaway near the water, but Christine talked him into buying a second house in Bracebridge instead, convincing him to rent out the Huntsville property instead. Leveraging the Huntsville property, Mullins purchased a second home in Bracebridge, Ontario.
The couple moved in February, 2013. This new property, situated on the Muskoka River near Santa’s Village, has been described as a 3,500 square foot mini-mansion, with a beautiful full stone fireplace and the finest amenities. Bill put Christine on the title of both homes, as well as on a joint bank account to manage their finances and properties. Bill was in love.
Canada Court Watch members at rally
The relationship between William Mullins and Christine Rupert became troubled early on. On June 11, 2011 Bill caught a glimpse of something unusual on Christine’s FaceBook “Cafe World” game–messages from a fellow player asking her to call him. This resulted in a heated argument as Bill questioned who this was who was secretly messaging her to call him. In response to this query, she said she wanted to leave. She was free to leave, but Bill would not allow her to take his truck, and they began quarelling.
Unbeknownst to Bill, Christine dialed 911 during the argument. Hearing only an argument, the Ontario Provincial Police used GPS satellite technology to pinpoint the exact location of the originating cell call. Two officers showed up followed by an ambulance. Bill was shocked and could not understand why the police or the ambulance were there. He asked them what they were doing there. The officers explained the GPS gave their location and they wanted to know how Christine was doing. One officer went into the house to speak with her while the other spoke with Bill. Bill said that they only had an argument. Meanwhile, in the house, the older officer found a small amount of marijuna inside the housem and threatened to arrest Mullins.
Bill told the officers to leave. He also told the OPP officers he had been abused by police before and believed they intended to abuse him now. The police left while the ambulance took Christine without explanation. No charges were laid and he never saw those police officers ever again.
Unable to ascertain where Christine was by texting, calling, or emailing her, Bill managed to get word from a common friend, Suzanne LaFlamme, who texted that Christine had a stroke and was in the hospital. Christine meanwhile claimed to others that she was in a woman’s shelter. According to Bill, it turns out Christine was actually in Kitchener, which is where Bill finally caught up with her. They talked in her truck, and Bill wanted to know what was going on and how long she had been in Kitchener. She said she did not know and seemed she had not slept in days. Bill then left Christine in Kitchener. Two years later Bill found evidence she had been smoking crack during this time in Kitchener.
Various sources have been contacted by this reporter, confirming that Christine Rupert had her children taken due to extensive drug use. William Mullins-Johnson had to be present for Christine’s supervised visitation with her then 9 year old son because of this.
A number of days after the encounter in Kitchener, Christine called Bill in Huntsville. They met at a WalMart parking lot where they had a discussion. According to Bill, there was a lot of pain between them. A couple of days later they spoke with each other again. It was during these discussions that Christine begged to come back to Bill. Within their second meeting, he said he was not sure if he wanted her back. He agreed for her to come back on condition they entered into marriage counseling. Christine hesitated, but then agreed. In total she was gone for about 10 days. But the June 11 incident came up a number of times in the coming two years.
Bill took out a $50,000 line of credit at the Bank of Montreal and bought Christine a brand new Tahoe truck. He wanted Christine to have a safe vehicle to see her kids in Kitchener and the means if she ever wanted to leave.
In August of 2013, Bill rushed to Sault Saint Marie Ontario. His aunt was deathly ill and not expected to survive. Christine did not want go with Bill during his time of difficulty. She preferred to stay, entertaining her guest friends at their luxurious home in Bracebridge. The aunt unexpectedly recovered. Bill called that he was coming home sooner than expected, but Christine who usually was anxious for him to return, told him to wait and come home in a few days. When Bill returned, he could smell the odour of burnt Brillo and suspected crack was being smoked in the house. Bill and Christine argued about this, and about Derrick, a hired hand doing odd jobs around the house. Christine would not agree to fire Derrick.
About a week after his return from Sault Saine Marie, Bill realized his relationship with Christine Rupert was doomed. He told Christine he felt she had set him up like a mark, and her attraction to him was all a sham. He left peacefully on September 1, 2013, moved back to Sault Saint Marie and bought a house.
Christine Rupert had prepared an application in Family Court dated September 10 making claims against Bill. The original application, later amended by her lawyer MacFarlane, was never served on William Mullins(-Johnson). Examining the Family Court Application reveals gross inconsistencies including what appear to be various serious allegations including sexual abuse, rape, assault and unlawful confinement. The document is rife with innuendos to make Bill Mullins appear to be a dangerous man. We are left to consider why a woman who describes a man to be so dangerous would leave Kitchener in the first place to begin a relationship with such a supposedly violent man.
Tom Walkling is Bill’s personal therapist. Walkling had worked with Bill to help him deal with many difficult years of being wrongfully incarcerated. Rupert Claims in paragraph 35 of her application that Tom Walkling stated the following, “That she should leave the house, that he feared for her safety, that she should pack everything and leave, ‘Don’t get shot in the yard,’ that he is Aboriginal and his extended family have guns for hunting.” When asked about these allegations, Walkling said he would not have made such statements in that context.
Bill is very upset that anyone would imply aboriginal people are violent and that they would hunt people. Yet this same inference was repeated by Justice Thomas M. Wood within his finding of fact. To someone reading such a document without knowing the other side of the story, one can easily be misled to think it must be true since a Judge said so.
Nearing the end of September 2013, Christine Rupert made application in Family Court for a restraining order against William Mullins. He was given a 5-hour window of opportunity to collect his belongings from his own home, under OPP supervision. The OPP refused to assist despite a court order to do so. They eventually showed up for two hours and presented Bill a $610.00 invoice for two hours of their police services.
While Christine Rupert is on title of both properties and a joint account holder, she did not contribute any of her own money to acquire any of the assets she is now making claim against.
Christine Rupert claims she had a chair thrown at her, was raped, sexually assaulted, threatened to be thrown through a wall, threatened that she would be shot, was unlawfully confined, insinuating Aboriginals are violent, and other outlandish remarks in her Family Court Application. The police have not investigated said claims, no significant evidence has been offered, and no charges have been laid against Mr. Mullins in relation to these allegations Rupert.
A process server at Newmarket Courthouse in Ontario, asked to comment on the story, said under conditions of anonymity that over the past 10 years she has seen that nearly every application made by a woman to the family court contains one or more allegations of rape, domestic violence, and sexual assault. She also said that something she called “the silver bullet” is often used, which is a claim the male committed child molestation. This process server, who wishes to remain anonymous, stated that making these allegations guarantees immediate child custody and control of the matrimonial home. She said that Family Court is outright broken because of things like this.
A York Regional Police Officer, also speaking under condition of anonymity, said he has seen gross injustices in both Family and Criminal Courts. He said he could never do police work on the street again, given the outcome he has witnessed in the courts where people, mostly men, are routinely unjustly prosecuted and incarcerated.
A motion was scheduled by Mullins in Bracebridge Court, heard by Justice Tom M. Wood, February 24, 2014. The purpose of the motion was to deal with the Mullins v. Rupert $650,000.00 Statement of Claim for fraud. The motion is to have the matter heard in Toronto where it is more likely an impartial hearing can be expected. Allowing the fraud suit to be heard in court, Mullins believes, would render the Rupert Family Court application baseless and fraudulent.
OPP and Chad Wells
Canada Court Watch has found extensive corruption at the Bracebridge Courthouse, where a number of protests against Justice Wood have taken place. During one of these peaceful lawful protests, Justice T.M. Wood ordered Chad Wells arrested. He was unlawfully arrested, detained and harassed by Bracebridge OPP officers for a number of hours. The entire event was captured on digital audio. Wells was eventually released from the courthouse police holding area.
Meanwhile that same day Vernon Beck, founder of Canada Court Watch, was threatened with arrest by the same Justice. Mr. Beck describes the incident. “I was in the courtroom in support of D.H. who was being ill treated by Justice Wood. I had never before met him. In open court Justice Tom Wood sternly asked, ‘Is Vernon Beck in the room?’ I identified myself. Justice Wood immediately instructed me to leave his courtroom. I asked him to make an order to that effect. He refused and said if you do not leave you will be arrested!” There was no just reason to order Mr. Beck from the courtroom. He did not want to be arrested that day.
? William Mullins(-Johnson) is to pay Christine Rupert $10,000.00 to cover her legals expenses against Mr. Mullins and the right for Rupert to seek further advances.
? Mullins motion to dismiss or stay Christine Ruperts application, dismissed.
? Mullins $650,000 fraud Statement of Claim against Rupert moved to Muskoka from Toronto, consolidated into the Family Court application of Rupert and taken as the response to the Rupert Family Court Application.
Mr. Mullins says, “The entire Family Court Application by Christine Rupert is founded on fraud including racial discrimination. The ruling by Justice Tom M. Wood is a slap in my face thwarting my fraud civil suit that would flesh out the truth. He is instrumental in circumventing due process. Moreover, making an impetuous ruling awarding unjust monetary gain to a fraudster, Christine Rupert.”
Mr. Mullins says he will fight tirelessly to ensure he is not subject to a second judicial abuse in Ontario, Canada. One wrongful conviction by irresponsible authorities is enough, and abuse by civil authorities like this should not be tolerated.
Links to attachment(s): Pdf file Claim Sault Saint Marie, Ontario, Canada William Mullins-Johnson $650,000 civil claim against Christine Rupert in Superior Court for fraud: www.brainsyn ... attachment
I despise anyone who takes advantage of a vulnerable person, in this case William Mullins-Johnson. This man spends 12.5 years behind bars wrongfully convicted of murdering and sodomizing his 3 year old niece. Vindicated, only to be again taken advantage of by a manip...
Google results Adam Warren comments on the voice for men May 2014Audience: Authenticated Re: Adam Ashley Warren comments on a Voice for Men Invalid access privileges authenticate to see this reply ...
This are Adams Warren original statements from Feb 2013Audience: Authenticated Re: Adam Ashley Warren Invalid access privileges authenticate to see this reply ...
Got this from our very active Grandparent group in Alaska. This is the last words of a mother that committed suicide. We need to contact our legislators to change the laws. Child support is enforced visitation is not. Targeted parents are killing themselves because they feel powerless, hopeless! ... access page ...
Got this from our very active Grandparent group in Alaska. This is the last words of a mother that committed suicide. We need to contact our legislators to change the laws. Child support is enforced visitation is not. Targeted parents are killing themselves because they feel powerless, hopeless!
Also the greedy alienating parents commit crimes or just screw up and then the children go to OCS/DCS and children are accidently killed here!!!! Please stop this madness~Jan
Chris Mackney committed suicide because the corrupt family courts sided with and conspired with his ex-wife to drive him from his children's lives, and he couldn't take it anymore.
Chris left a suicide note. His ex-wife is trying to keep websites like A Voice For Men and others from publishing this note. She is claiming she "owns" the note.
I am doing my part to get the word out, and to make sure that evil bitch does not have her way.
In this video, Janet Bloomfield "reverses the genders" so that you can see if you yourself have gender bias: would you care MORE if the person who this happened to was the wife, not the husband?
Powerful stuff.
Last Testament of a loving father abused by the family court system and alienated from his children MessageDetail/1460
CANADA Criminalization of Children - Harry Kopyto will present a lecture on matters concerning children and how schools and the judicial system, including the police are needlessly criminalizing them. This will follow our silent auction earlier in the afternoon. Be sure to attend and please share... access page ...
CANADA Criminalization of Children - Harry Kopyto will present a lecture on matters concerning children and how schools and the judicial system, including the police are needlessly criminalizing them. This will follow our silent auction earlier in the afternoon. Be sure to attend and please share this announcement. Thank you.
The Canadian Maltese Charitable Service Trust is hosting a public event where Harry Kopyto will speak about the grave conditions children are facing in a society that is increasingly criminalizing them, according to a number of organizations such as A Voice For Men, Canada Court Watch and National Coalition for Men. Children, usually boys, are facing difficulties at school where children as young as 5 are criminalized for normal behaviour, according to Dean Esmay, operational manager of A Voice For Men.
Vernon Beck of Canada Court Watch has been documenting numerous abuses against children over a 20 year period and says it has been getting worse year by year.
Dr. Miles Groth, Professor of psychology at Wagner College in New York, says, “The most important thing is public awareness, especially about how boys are treated in school. I see them when they have gotten to college, and more and more are withdrawn and distant.”
Kopyto delivered his first speech at the age of ten. He began advocating for the rights of his fellow students in High School. Kopyto’s legal career spans 40 years advocating for the rights of his fellow man, adhering according to his admirers to strict morals and principals. Harry remains steadfast in his life long ambition to advocate and fight for the underdog, the weak, the oppressed, the old, children, the disabled, the minority, the underprivileged, the poor and anyone who was subject to discrimination in any and every way..
Attila Vinczer: This is a very important lecture. Harry is the oldest known advocate for the rights of our fellow man who has been doing so for nearly 60 years in Canada. I urge you to show your support and come out to 707 Srigley in Newmarket, Royal Canadian Legion.
Good link. I hope that isn't you the video is actually talking about.
Damn bro. Good luck. You should contact A Voice for Men with this. I'm dealing with my own false accusations right now where the police raided my house. The situation is still not resolved, and my accuser was still n... access page ...
Good link. I hope that isn't you the video is actually talking about.
Damn bro. Good luck. You should contact A Voice for Men with this. I'm dealing with my own false accusations right now where the police raided my house. The situation is still not resolved, and my accuser was still not identified to me.
she decided to make a DVD at the police station, I decided after I was freed of all charges to show the Video for all to learn from
That's the right thing to do. We can't just disappear while this is happening to us and others.
I don't have any sway there, they actually ignored my story, but you have a lot more evidence and it might be useful to them. Just email their news editor, you can find it on their website avoiceformen.com . You might also want to talk to Chandrapal S Bhasker, he's interested in the legal/media aspect of these things more than I am. I'm more MGTOW.
Over the past week some controversial posters have been popping up on Saskatoon streets.
The posters, which are connected with a group called 'A Voice for Men,' carry slogans such as "Feminism Equals Male Disposability" and "... access page ...
Over the past week some controversial posters have been popping up on Saskatoon streets.
The posters, which are connected with a group called 'A Voice for Men,' carry slogans such as "Feminism Equals Male Disposability" and "Men's Rights are Human Rights."
They go on to compare men's rights to that of minority groups such as "African Americans, Jews and gay and lesbian people."
One message on a poster states Canada is the most dangerous place to be, if you're male.
On its website, the group's mission statement says it's "sole ideology is compassion for men and boys that is equal to that of women and any other identified group."
Earl Silverman was a man who spent 20 years of his life trying to help men and boys who have been abused. On Friday he was found hanging in the garage of his home in Calgary, where his men's clinic was shut down and where a suicide note appears to blame the Canadian government for not paying enou... access page ...
Earl Silverman was a man who spent 20 years of his life trying to help men and boys who have been abused. On Friday he was found hanging in the garage of his home in Calgary, where his men's clinic was shut down and where a suicide note appears to blame the Canadian government for not paying enough attention to male victims of domestic violence. And in the days since, the myths (that men are abused as often as men) and realities (that men are abuse victims) have returned around the so-called Men's Rights Movement, or MRM, leaving advocates on both sides as conflicted as the man who apparently took his own life fighting for a controversial cause. We've attempted to sort them out:
What is the MRM? That depends on who you ask. Men's rights advocates, on the most basic level, claim they are combating discrimination and injustices toward men. Which sounds like a reactionary version of feminism for men, but this isn't all men's lib: MRM advocates focus on family law, military service, and domestic violence, insisting that men often get treated unfairly in these spheres of society. Clearly, their positions do not always go over well.
Sounds like men's rights advocates aren't the worst people on Earth. What's the controversy?
Well, theory and execution are different things. As the Southern Poverty Law Center reported last year, the MRM's most visible advocates often engage in perpetuating misogynistic myths. The SPLC wrote:
Some suggest that women attack men, even sexually, just as much as men attack women. Others claim that vast numbers of reported rapes of women, as much as half or even more, are fabrications designed to destroy men they don’t like or to gain the upper hand in contested custody cases And the SPLC has data debunking the myth that women attack men as much as men attack women:
A major 2010 study by the Centers for Disease Control’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control thoroughly debunks such claims. Nearly one in five American women (18.3%), the study found, have been raped; the comparable number for men is one in 71 (1.4%). Not only that, but more than half (51.1%) of female victims reported that their rapist was an intimate partner — a current or former spouse or boyfriend, or a date. The movement has struggled to find allies with tenets that don't hold up to the facts. Indeed, the abuse comparisons — that men were as likely to be abused as women — have been thought to undermine the potential good the movement could do for actual male victims of abuse. "Men's Rights Activists are rage-filled misogynists who claim feminists intentionally 'cover up' issues like male rape and workplace injury rates so women can achieve global domination," wrote Jezebel's Katie J.M. Baker in describing members of the movement.
So was Earl Silverman the good kind of advocate or the not-so-good kind? Well, Silverman is known for having founded Canada's first shelter established for male victims of domestic abuse, out of his own pocket, because he couldn't find support services for himself. Silverman claims his wife abused him, and that's the reason he left her some 20 years ago. "There were a lot for women, and the only programs for men were for anger management," Silverman told Canada's National Post shortly before his death. "As a victim, I was re-victimized by having these services telling me that I wasn't a victim, but I was a perpetrator."
Silverman's shelter, the Men's Alternative Safe House in Calgary, was not funded by the government, and he failed to raise enough money from private donations to keep it open. MASH, as it was known, closed down last month. "The day after he packed up his recently sold home — also the site of the Men’s Alternative Safe House — Earl Silverman was found hanging in his garage," reports the National Post.
This man killed himself because a men's abuse shelter shut down?
Well, according to Silverman's reported suicide note, that could have been a factor. "In a four-page suicide note, Silverman blamed the government for failing to recognize male victims of domestic abuse and for not providing enough services to help those in need," Huffington Post Canada reports.
Well, isn't that a shame? Some people are conflicted, but nobody should forget this man's legacy — if only to bring some level of awareness to some other side, however unequal the two sides really are. "There are male victims. Whether we're talking about violence or sexual abuse, we need to understand that, and to treat men who have been the victims of abuse with respect and compassion," Salon's Mary Elizabeth Williams writes. She adds: "Yet where Silverman came up short was in perpetuating the Men's Rights movement's fiction that there's any gender equity as far as violence and victims."
Is there still a backlash? Well, MRM advocates and activists are upset with the news. There's little doubt that Silverman had good intentions, but a truly disconcerting part of all this comes from followers of his movement who are now taking the opportunity to slam feminism. Here's a screenshot from one the posts addressing Silverman's death on the Men's Rights forum at Reddit:
And here's a comment on A Voice For Men, a blog dedicated to the MRM, which sort of turns on feminism, and turned gender equality into a perpetrator.
Surely, this was a man going through financial hardship, who struggled to keep his passion project afloat, who took his own life. But nobody has to believe that feminism can kill, or facts that aren't true.
Re: The modus operandi of a druggie who stole one million dollars from a man who spent over 12 years in jail
: Follow-up by: Miriam
