Ignorance of the law is no excuse, its only because we are incompetent to act or think for ourselves that we need a nanny state to legislate
Government insists it is god, legislating against the divine natural law of a father’s love for his child, self-evidence of gov&rsquo... access page ...
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, its only because we are incompetent to act or think for ourselves that we need a nanny state to legislate
Government insists it is god, legislating against the divine natural law of a father’s love for his child, self-evidence of gov’s crimes and its latest victims are plastered in the news; at least three times last month a father was driven to the extreme of murdering their ex after courts ruled heavily prejudiced in favour of the woman as is to often the case, without ANY consideration for the father’s feelings.
Frankly the treatment a parent is subjected to by family court judges often can be described as “legal” cruel and unusual treatment; it’s one thing to demand unreasonable alimony as often is the case, but to arbitrarily deny a parent access to their child, there is no greater punishment; a fate worse than death, slowly tearing away at a person from the inside out, turning an otherwise good man to bad, sometimes leading to death as we all witnessed. It’s these kinds of events that make a man lose faith in government and the society they have created acting as gods of the public domain. [keep in mind the devil is considered a god by some]
These events are not the exception; there are literally thousands of parents subjected to this kind of torture day in and day out in this sick society because god/government “thinks” it knows best; yes indeed even going so far as to sometimes remove BOTH parents for what gov bureaucrats deems as a sin. I know of parents who were forced to subject their child to ten vaccines at once because the child had never gotten any shots over the span from birth, [and was perfectly healthy] but in order to get social assistance it was god/gov’s law that the child had to have them even though it made the child sick. Regardless of what anyone “thinks”, In reality government is nothing more than a heartless apathetic machine like the presumptuous titanic, steaming towards an iceberg of ignorance and malice without consideration for its passengers.[understand a god is one who is not held accountable for its actions]
It’s interesting to note, out of all the child deaths in Canada, it’s more common for more deaths to happened in the care of gov child services than in parents care. I couldn’t find the numbers for BC, but a recent article stated, from 1999 up to last year, 145 children died in Alberta’s ministry care, half of them were NEVER reported. And in no case were any public servants held accountable. As humans we have emotions and feelings that we can’t control because they are caused by outside factors; Just like I find myself getting angry just reading the statistics and watching the news knowing innocent children are being harmed by governments incompetence. The insanity of humanity playing gods as if it were girls playing Barbie dolls, government really is childish in its actions to disregard human emotions as if we were all robots that could have legislation programmed into us while shitting alimony payments out like golden eggs.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, its only because we are incompetent to act or think for ourselves that we need a nanny state to legislate; but think outside of the box, learn to be responsible for your own actions;
Understand you are sovereign, you bring the law in your family court. In my case, before our child was born, we agreed on worst case scenarios; in case of divorce we would share custody and costs, there would be no alimony or power trips. Eventually years later we did grow apart, during the legal proceedings, my ex was given a high priced lawyer from her union. Before we went in court, the lawyer was making usual demands and threats. When we got into court, I stood up and told the judge we had it all arranged and organized long ago, there would be no alimony or demands.
The judge asked my ex if that was the case, and she agreed. The lawyer objected and wined but the judge told her to sit down and shut up because we had come to an agreement on our own that was binding and lawful. Today we now have a great relationship as ex’s/friends, rarely do we have a problem, we both support each other and adjust to our sons needs, and best of all our son was not put in the middle to be used as a physiological weapon. Now our agreement was verbal, but I would recommend in this day and age to do a simple written agreement with witness before the child is even born, preferably even conceived. This way if things go sour, one parent can’t use the kids as a weapon. Law doesn’t have to be complicated.
The same can be said for a simple relationship; last year the nanny state legislate sticking its narcissists nose where it doesn't belong; legislating a mate is entitled to half your property if you have lived together for merely a year, which only serves to flood the fragile court system and create wars of wicked words, which as we witness in the news can lead to deadly outcomes.
By crafting a written agreement, [with two witness signing] you are creating a legal binding contract/agreement stating both agree not to claim the other’s property, nor will you seek support from the other so that in this way you can be confident a person isn't loving you for your financial assets. It is also better get an agreement early on when things are good, because often when things go bad, feelings get the better of a situation that can lead to a dangerous build up of human emotion from a cause and effect that is ABOVE THE LAW.
Category:
FamilyCourt