I am involved in a CAS matter involving a teenager in which the teen's worker has indicated that she cannot speak to me as the child's advocate in spite of the teen signing a consent form to this effect. The unregistered CAS worker said that she was advised "verbally" by her supervisor at the age... access page ...

I am involved in a CAS matter involving a teenager in which the teen's worker has indicated that she cannot speak to me as the child's advocate in spite of the teen signing a consent form to this effect. The unregistered CAS worker said that she was advised "verbally" by her supervisor at the agency not to speak to me or to communicate with me in spite of information I had in my possession which related to the best interest of the teen. As an advocate I was offering my help not only to the teen involved but to the CAS agency as well in the best interest of the teen.

Sadly, if this worker does not come to her senses soon, this one worker is going to learn a very hard lesson. Other workers have been fired for acting in violation of the legislation after following the "verbal" instructions of their supervisors. The recent 1.4 million dollar legal costs ordered against the CAS in another case is just the beginning of what is going to make child protection workers accountable for their actions.

Each worker is individually responsible to comply with the act and each worker is personally responsible for their clients. Following the verbal instructions of a supervisor will not allow workers to claim immunity under the Child and Family Services Act if they make a mistake at the instructions of their supervisors. In fact, I has seen some supervisors claim that they never told their workers to do certain things in order to save their own jobs. As a result those workers who followed the verbal instructions of their supervisors were dismissed from their jobs.

My advice to all CAS workers is that if you are given any verbal orders not to speak to or to communicate with an advocate when the child has signed a consent form to that effect, you had better get these instructions in writing from your supervisor and keep a copy of those instructions safe in your home, otherwise you may end up taking the brunt of a personal lawsuit as well as a loss of your job.

Every CAS worker has an obligation to listen to and to consider ALL information which could have an effect on decisions made in respect to a certain child. Refusing to consider information of relevance is considered under the law as failing to exercise "due diligence". Immunity does not apply when workers refuse to consider information made available to them.

CAS workers are well advised to cover their own backs and not to take instructions from supervisors unless it is in writing. If a supervisor is going to let a worker be the fall guy then the worker might as well take the supervisor down with him/her. Better still, keep an open mind and consider all information which may have relevance in your client's cases. Supervisors are there to assist workers but not to tell workers how to do their jobs.

If any CAS worker would like to contact me personally on this issue, I would very much welcome your comments and arguments. I would also like to hear from any former CAS workers who have left the CAS out of their objections to what they were instructed to do by senior staff and did not think it ethical. Send any reply to info@canadacourtwatch.com

You may not know that you have been a victim of motherisk. Many other labs have taken hair samples and sent them to motherisk for the drug / alcohol screening to be done. CAS also has sat parents in a chair in their office and proceeded to use not sterilized tools not sterilized envelope. No chai... access page ...

You may not know that you have been a victim of motherisk. Many other labs have taken hair samples and sent them to motherisk for the drug / alcohol screening to be done. CAS also has sat parents in a chair in their office and proceeded to use not sterilized tools not sterilized envelope. No chain of command as called for in proper procedure and protocol . If I can have the names of the labs that everyone was sent to . We can find out what your lab did with your hair sample. Unbelievable the wrong that has been done in these cases.

Or in the case of my daughter ........ she was arrested on false charges .... hair taken at Elgin Middlesex Detention Center in 2007 Elgin ..... chain of command .... seriously? and my son in law in 2012 in oxford county ...... trace???? seriously ..... it is positive or negative .... not trace???? and there are serum toxicology tests and x2 per week at that time urine tests that prove the motherisk test were fake fake fake for oxford CA$ summary judgement ,,,,, oooooppppssss oxford CA$ ..... you screwed up large ehhh ..... both children were taken on false tests ......

Again. No i don't want my daughter to read any of this. Hence why it should not have been posted. S

Like I said, Actually you are a liar. We have already spoken you are part of this sick cult fathers rights. If you had all this information then you would know clearly that phill and I h... access page ...

Again. No i don't want my daughter to read any of this. Hence why it should not have been posted. S

Like I said, Actually you are a liar. We have already spoken you are part of this sick cult fathers rights. If you had all this information then you would know clearly that phill and I have never once been to custody, not once. We had a simple mediation and an agreed schedule we followed due to me getting cancer and having to be on a temporary move. As any women would have to be on with Stage 3b breast cancer. Phillip and I skied all winter, we have many photos of us doing tons of stuff together. Yes this year was hard as I had cancer. Of course we worked around my mastectomies, radiation and chemo. What good father wouldn't. As far as slander. No one would even be having to write or defend themselves if his ex hadent go to this extent. If she cared about His daughter she wouldn't be. No one would have to speak of his alcolism if she was being truthful on social media and NOT posting this ridiculous and not truthful defamation of character. I have a right to defend myself, my daughter and Phillip. Child alientarion??? How do you see that?? When he just had her June 6-22? He had her all of May, he came down to Vancouver and spend months with us and also brought her to Nelson when I was fighting for my life. June 6-22? And 9 days later he ends his life? How do you loose sight of your child? Instead of blaming people, yes there should be awareness to mental illness, depression and alcolism. Those who know Phill, knew he drank way before me. He drank with a baby. We dearly dearly loved Phill. Phill and this women were going through a separation, he was single. He went out on the town. That is not my doing. She cannot put that on me. I have one more surgery I am still awaiting. I even met Phillip closer then Vancouver to help him. So he didn't need to drive to Vancouver. I met him in Kamloops and on july 15th was auppose to meet him in Revelstoke BC. You know nothing about this story. You are listening to one side a women who has always been against me, a women who deeply betrayed me and when Phillip and I were just me and Snow we were happy. It's devestating that this women who wrote this couldn't of been happy for us. No one ever turned Phill away from his daughter. When kids are yound even parents who are togehter their kids have separation anxiety. Snow was at the most beautiful age now, almost more time work her father then with me! My mother watched Snow every day in June when Phill and to work! A father that is with his child every month is NOT aliented at all. A father who pays $400 if he drive to Van child support is NOT high child support. I was fighting for my life. The only thing in Phill's life that changed as he split with this women and was living alone. I am back in Neslon with tons of support as everyone here saw Phill with his kid all the time. This is a crazy, untruthful terrible story. You blame me for speaking??! Look at you writing again... there would be nothing to write off without his ex carolyn posting all over the place do to her serious jealously and reading things out of content. Was she there when we spoke on the phone? No. All parents talk about things, that's normal. My family and I loved Phillip with all our hearts. We don't need this. We need peace and to remember a good man. Snow and I speak of all His beauty everyday. If any of you cared about Snow this would be taken down. This energy is not good for me or her. Selfish and cruel. You people have NEVER even met us. You don't know us.

Phillip was a very involved father. You are also forgetting our child had just turned 4 years old and was nursing until she was 3. 

Phill was at my house everyday single day in May. We had a beautiful birthday for his daughter. You do not know anything besides some BS lies

You call me a half-breed and maybe you`re right. My eyes they are brown and my skin isn't white. But let us look back to my family tree, for we are related, the white man and me.

Two centuries ago when the indians did roam over this land which was their home sweet home, The white man arri... access page ...

You call me a half-breed and maybe you`re right. My eyes they are brown and my skin isn't white. But let us look back to my family tree, for we are related, the white man and me.

Two centuries ago when the indians did roam over this land which was their home sweet home, The white man arrived and they took a long look, around for some women to sew and cook.

I'm watching this right now. Thank God for Chris Carter, Alfredine Linda Plourde, Mr. William Mullins Johnson and for all people who stand for JUSTICE

I suppose no one should be shocked by what passes for justice in our country. We innocently believe that e... access page ...

I'm watching this right now. Thank God for Chris Carter, Alfredine Linda Plourde, Mr. William Mullins Johnson and for all people who stand for JUSTICE

I suppose no one should be shocked by what passes for justice in our country. We innocently believe that evidence is collected then subsequently used to find the person/persons responsible for the crime. Clearly the opposite happens. Years of this man's life have been stolen. His family has been stolen. That he has the strength to stand up for justice is a testament to his character. One more voice for justice.

I, as well as many other fathers, am having extreme difficult with my change in Consent Order.

I have been dealing with the Court of Qeens Bench Saint John for over 11 years now and have yet to see light at the end of this dark tunnel.

We had reached an agreement July 25, 20... access page ...

I, as well as many other fathers, am having extreme difficult with my change in Consent Order.

I have been dealing with the Court of Qeens Bench Saint John for over 11 years now and have yet to see light at the end of this dark tunnel.

We had reached an agreement July 25, 2017 granting e primary care and control of our 14 year old son that which the Judge would not allow a VOTC.

We are now September 19, 2017 and i have yet to see the signed document as the lawyers are staling.
They have also been conversating without my knowledge which is a direct violation with their code ethics.
Please contact for advice as to how to file a proper complaint against the solicitors and Court. 

I can only hope that this would happen to my daughters and myself. It would be amazing for the judge to order me sole custody of my daughters... But right now the judge has his mind made up. I hope that at final trial the judge pays attention to the evidence that I ha... access page ...

I can only hope that this would happen to my daughters and myself. It would be amazing for the judge to order me sole custody of my daughters... But right now the judge has his mind made up. I hope that at final trial the judge pays attention to the evidence that I have showing that I havent lied about my side of the case at all. We shall see..

I would like to file a formal complaint regarding being intimidated, harassed and denied entry to the Sault Ste Marie, Ontario family court by court security officers during my attempt to attend my Settlement Conference on Tuesday May 28, 2013. I was ordered to leave court property by the Seargan... access page ...

I would like to file a formal complaint regarding being intimidated, harassed and denied entry to the Sault Ste Marie, Ontario family court by court security officers during my attempt to attend my Settlement Conference on Tuesday May 28, 2013. I was ordered to leave court property by the Seargant of the Security Services Court Division Sault Ste Marie who would appear to have control and aggression issues. What I experienced on that day as well as the following day as a member of the public was nothing less than an abuse of power and authority by some over-zealous security officers at the courthouse. 

Details of the first incident of intimidation and harassment by court security officers on Tuesday, May 28, 2013

At about 1:40 pm on Tuesday May 28, 2013 I entered the front entrance of the courthouse to appear at a Settlement Conference at 2 pm in courtroom #6. Just inside the entrance door, there were two security guards sitting at a desk chatting to each other. As I approached the security screening area, the officers turned and looked at me. The one security officer with glasses knew me by sight as I had been to the court on a number of similar occasions. While still sitting, the one security guard with glasses at the desk said "Hey" as if to greet me.

Having a lot on my mind as family court is very stressful and being heavily in thought about my upcoming Settlement Conference proceedings I did not take any significance in the officer saying "Hey" to me so I said nothing in reply. I just got my metal keys out of my pocket and ready to put in the plastic tray in preparation of going through the metal detector. The guard with the glasses at the desk then said, "How are we today?.....You not talking?" in a condescending manner as if to be insulted for not answering his question about how I was doing that day. Again, with my mind being focussed on my upcoming family court matter, I simply replied, "Do I have to talk?" I simply was not in the mood to engage in general conversation with the officers. I simply wanted to enter the court and go about my business in the court as I have done many times in the past.

I placed my car keys and my phone into the plastic basket. The officer with the glasses took my carrying case to inspect it. Instead of just looking in the case to see that there were no metal objects as has been done on previous times, he disturbed the papers in a very sloppy and uncaring manner.

Anyone with any sense could have easily seen that there were only papers in my very small case without having to disturb the papers. There was only one compartment holding my papers. Some of my papers were bent and not in their original condition after the officer had messed them up. There was really no need for the officer to reach in and to move papers. Below is a photo of the very simple case I had with me that day (See pdf file attachment)

I was then told to walk through the metal detector. The metal detector alarm went off and I was told to take my coat off and return for a second pass. I went back and gave my coat to the guard with glasses and returned to the metal detector for a second pass. I walked though and the metal detector went off again. The only thing on me that was metal was my belt buckle which was clearly visible above my shirt. Having a bit of a belly, anyone could see my stomach tight to my belt. I told the officer that it was my belt setting off the alarm. At this point I would have expected one of the officers to scan me with a hand held detector to confirm that it was my belt. Instead of doing what should have been common sense and to use the hand wand, the guard with the glasses asked me to walk back to go through the walk through scanner and to take my belt off before going through this time. I am a tall person and my belt was the only thing holding my pants up.

As I had been through the same security system at this court before and allowed to enter with belt buckles on my pants, I simply asked, “Is this really necessary?” The officer then responded by telling me that they make everyoneremove their belts. I knew what the officer was telling me was not true at all.
I have gone through the metal detectors on three previous occasions with a metal belt buckle since the implementation of security measures at this court. On previous occasions security officers simply used their hand metal detection wand to confirm the belt buckle. It was very evident at that point from his tone of voice and body language that the officer with the glasses was insisting on these “extra” measures to have me take my belt off was for the purpose just to harass me and to abuse his power and authority over me for some unknown reason.

The officer with the glasses told me in a very aggressive and arrogant manner that I either take my belt off or be denied entry to the building. This put me in a embarrassing situation as my pants would surely fall down if I removed my belt. I found it very demeaning the way I was being treated and did not take my belt off. I decided to go next door to the Services Ontario building to seek assistance and to file a complaint.

I did not want to create a confrontation with the one officer in charge and turned and left the court building. I then proceeded next door to the Services Ontario building looking for help and to file a complaint. Staff at the Services Ontario building were familiar with me and I asked for assistance to get back into the courthouse. The one lady I knew told me to wait and that she would call the manager of the court operations to assist me.

While waiting to meet the manager three security guards come out of the west staff entrance of the courthouse. One of the officers spotted me and gestured for me to come towards him. I thought that these officers were gesturing me to come over in response to my request to meet with the courthouse manager. The three officers walked up the ramp and stopped me just at the outside of the entrance door to the Services Ontario building as I came out of the building. The officers then surrounded me and blocked me.

One of the three officers by the name of Ron came up very close to me and stood within a half an arm’s length from me. From where I was standing, I was unable to move in any direction without my body physically contacting one of the three officers surrounding me. In a very demanding manner, Ron then demanded as to what my business was. Very clearly, he was acting in a very aggressive and threatening manner. By his tone of voice and body language, Ron was ready to create an incident. I felt very intimidated.

The Assistant Manager of Court Operations, Chantal Corriveu, came out the same door the officers had come from and walked up to where I was standing with the officers. I did not know who she was. She said that she was here to see me. The officer, Ron, who was threatening me, became quite once Chantal appeared.

I told her about my problems being denied entry to the courthouse and that I wanted information on how to file a complaint about my experience. I was told that her boss was not available that day to make a complaint.

When officer Ron heard me say that I wanted to file a complaint, he stated in a very loud voice that I would not be filing any complaint against anyone. Mentioning that I wanted to file a complaint against the officers at the security entrance clearly made him angry. He was clearly angry, confrontational and looking to instigate some sort of incident.

Ron said I was being “aggressive” and then ordered that I was to leave the grounds immediately.

The use of the word “aggressive” clearly frightened me as I was not being aggressive at all. I was being labeled as being aggressive for simply questioning as to why it was necessary to take off my belt. If anyone was being aggressive, it was officer Ron. I backed away and moved away from the front of the Services Ontario building in an attempt to put some space between myself and the officers and to show my compliance to his order to remove myself from the property. The officers followed me down the ramp. The officers, led by Ron, were clearly trying to provoke and intimidate me. I moved down and got behind a car so that the officers were not so close. Chantal stood at the top of the ramp near the entrance to the Services Ontario building while the officers continued to follow me.

I am sure that if it was not for the presence of Chantal that officers would have done something to provoke an incident.

When I reached the bottom of the ramp I asked Chantal if she could provide me with her name and the name of the manager of court operations before I left so that I could file a complaint. The officers were near to me on the otherside of a car. Chantal told me to wait where I was and she would return with the information. I stood were Iwas to wait for her to return. She walked into the Services Ontario Building.

As soon as Chantal entered the Services Ontario building and out of earshot, Ron again began to harass me. Ron started asking more questions. He wanted to know my name and where my car was parked. One of the officers knew my name and told it to Ron. Clearly, officer Ron was very aggressive and at that point I sensed that anything I said would only cause them to become more aggressive. I told the officers I did not want to talk and asked them to leave me alone while I waited for Chantal to provide me with the information I requested.

I just wanted to get the information from Chantal and then to leave the property as I had been ordered by Officer Ron. At this point I felt very scared and bullied by the officers.

About three minutes later Chantal came back out and gave me a business card with her name and the name of the Eric Pickard, Manager of Court Operations on the back.  Below is a copy of the card. (See pdf file attachment)

After receiving the card, Chantal took my name and phone number and after this I started walking away from the officers and towards the parking lot. I was scared at that point and felt that the officers were looking for some reason to arrest me. I believe that if had not been for the presence of Chantal to witness what was going on, that officer Ron would have found some reason to have escalated the already tense situation. I ended up being ordered by officer Ron to leave the court property and as a result of his order I was unable to attend my scheduled court appearance.

Second incident of intimidation and harassment at the Services Ontario building by the same three officers on Wednesday May 29 2013

The following morning on Wednesday May 29, 2013, at approximately 10 am, I contacted Chantal again in regards to how to proceed further with my complaint regarding being harassed and intimidated at the courthouse the previous day which preventing me from attending my court session. At the end of our conversation, I told Chantal that I would be at the Services Ontario building within the half hour to obtain a copy of the endorsement that had been issued by the judge against me the previous day in my absence.

I went into Service Ontario building with my partner Hilary. In light of the incident involving the three officers the day before, I was afraid to attend the Services Ontario building on my own without having a witness with me. Hilary and I entered the Services Ontario Building without incident and while inside reviewed the endorsement of Madam Justice M. Dunn.

As Hilary and I exited the Services Ontario building with the intent of simply returning to the parking lot and returning home, the same three guards that confronted me the day before were now standing a short distance from the Services Ontario building. As soon as the three officers saw Hilary and I, they rushed towards us. We attempted to walk down the steps but were surrounded by the three officers.

Hilary asked the guards politely if we had done something wrong and their reply was "no, just making sure everything was safe". Ron had a very intimidating presence. Officer Ron left the other officers and then walked into the Service Ontario building on his own. Taking into consideration officer Ron’s comment from the day before where he threatened me by stating that I would not be allowed to file any complaint, I suspect that officer Ron went into the Services Ontario building to ask if I had made a complaint. I verily believe that the only reason why matters did not escalate on this day was because I had a witness with me which I had brought for this very reason.

I continued to walk back to my car and Hilary went back and spoke to the two officers and asked why I was being harassed. The officers told her that all they had been told was that I had refused to take my belt off for the security at the courthouse. Clearly from their response, I was being targeted just because of the situation involving my belt. She then returned to our car and we drove home. Without a doubt I will have other court appearances to be addressed in the future at the Sault Ste. Marie Court House as my ex-spouse has created a lot of conflict attempting to deny access and alienate me from my daughter using the court system.

I now feel my safety and freedom is at risk supported by the fact of now being twice harassed and bullied by the officers. Staff at our courts should be providing services to the public, not acting like thugs to bully members of the public.

In summary, there is no doubt in my mind that my experience with officers at the courthouse nothing less than an abuse of power and authority by some specific officers. The one older officer named Ron who aggressively confronted me on two separate days clearly abused his power and authority.
I verily believe that officer Ron should not be working in a position of authority where he is expected to deal with members of the public who in many cases are emotionally distraught when they come to the courthouse. The officer at the security desk who I do not know the name of should not have insisted I take the belt off my pants as the officers have metal detection wands for detecting such items. What I find concerning is that both officer Ron and the officer with glasses are working with younger officers who I believe will ultimately learn such aggressive behaviours of the more senior officers they are working under.

Our courts are supposed to be places where the people of Ontario should feel safe and be treated with respect. As a member of the public, my respect for the administration of justice has been greatly eroded and it seems that I am not alone. Many other Canadians I speak to are saying as well that they have lost a lot of respect for the justice system as a result of the system becoming too adversarial, especially the family court system.

The bottom line is that the citizens of Canada should not have to feel compelled to bring a witness with them in order to feel protected from abuse of power by police officers at the courthouses.

To help put an end to this sort of abuse of power and authority by officers at the court, I would strongly recommend that all court officers who are expected to have dealings with members of the public be required to wear body mounted video/audio recording devices to record all interactions with members of the public. The technology is inexpensive and readily available and will significantly improve confidence in services at the courthouse. The public feels safer when there are steps implemented to ensure transparency and accountability of court security staff. Such technology would help protect both citizens and staff at the courthouses.

I would kindly ask that officer Ron be asked to not approach me anymore. In light of his apparent inability to control his anger and aggression and in light of this complaint which he said I could not make, it very likely he will be angry and may attempt to fabricate an incident to justify my arrest. I have read stories and reports of malicious arrests being used against citizens at other courthouses in Ontario to harass them.

I look forward to your response. A receipt by email would be appreciated.

Yours truly,
Vincent Schiele 

Source:
6 page Pdf file:

http://www.brainsyntax.com/Portal/Material/1/2013May04ComplaintToCourtServicesReHarassment.pdf

The Name "Ron" I learned later is wrong "Ron" refers to the Sergeant of the Sault Ste. Marie Ontario Court Service Devision.

Letter to the Prime Minister Office:
Re: harassment and intimidation of Canadians at our courts by court security officers
http://www.brainsyntax.com/Home/MessageDetail/665

Some public relation responses:
http://www.advocacycanada.com/Home/CCWServiceTopic?c=

I am a child who should have been apprehended, and I actually tried. I reported on my parents even wrote statements to the police. I was beaten and neglected by my parents, but they did nothing. The police reports disappeared as well. So I became a run away. When I was 15 I got pregnant and had t... access page ...

I am a child who should have been apprehended, and I actually tried. I reported on my parents even wrote statements to the police. I was beaten and neglected by my parents, but they did nothing. The police reports disappeared as well. So I became a run away. When I was 15 I got pregnant and had to move in to my Dad's, I still had a case still open with CAS and my oldest was born.

I became homeless when my parents through me and my 9 Month old son. I slept at friends houses but my ex was stalking me so bad they threw me out. I went to a home for abused women and they through me out for not making my bed.. so CAS came and I placed him with his great aunt. I started receiving threats that they were going to apprehended my son unwed I moved him in with my abusive mother.

So I did but she refused to take me to. Soon after his first birthday I moved back in with my father and tried to get my son, CAS came to my house and told me if I didn't sign a TCA I'd never see my son again, and that I didn't have time to speak to a lawyer. So I signed. I had to move out of my Dads and I moved in with my boyfriend. I continued to see my son. When the agreed upon three month period was up they served me.

My boyfriend was abusive they wanted me to leave him I got pregnant for my second son then my boyfriend committed suicide. CAS called me crazy and told me they were going to take my second child. However I went to st Mary's home in Ottawa which is a parenting shelter.

I was assessed throughout my second pregnancy and my second sons first 2 months if life then my son and I got discharged together because I passed so I was sent home with CAS approval. CAS at this point told me that in order to reintegrate my oldest that I would have to undergo a parenting capacity assessment. I passed this assessment a year later, and they made plans to give back my oldest.

My Mother however decided she wanted to keep my son to use him as a tool to hurt me. CAS let her take over fighting me. She tried to push CAS to adopt out my second son, she even picked out a home far away. However she didn't succeed. I still have my second son.

But after 4 years of my fighting first CAS and then her took 4 years. Our trial ended in march of this year. She got sole custody based on status quo. At this point I have two younger children at home with me, but I lost my oldest to my narcissistic Mother

- - - -

The reason they called me crazy is because my abusive boyfriend killed himself when I was 11 weeks pregnant with our son, and that unfortunately I found him, and suffered a deep grieving period.

I can totally relate and agree with that. However for myself, it isnt the other parent in the situation. It is maternal grandmother. She caused alot of strain, told alot of lies etc and sommehow got cas to help her get custody. It was nothing but threats, harassment etc and when my kids had visit... access page ...

I can totally relate and agree with that. However for myself, it isnt the other parent in the situation. It is maternal grandmother. She caused alot of strain, told alot of lies etc and sommehow got cas to help her get custody. It was nothing but threats, harassment etc and when my kids had visits with her shed tell them i dont love them, shed call them b word and other curse words. I worried about my kids as I had to get counselling for them.

The counsellor warned cas to not follow through that it is dangerous. Guess what, cas done it anyway which maternal grandmother hasnt let me see them for 6 yrs. maternal grandmother even admitted to the society she hits them. cas is Still involved and it boiled down to my daughter (now 14) begging to be put into care which is where she is currently because the abuse mentally and physically. I am still in the courts fighting this.

You'll need to provide all your financial stamens via Ontario court forms.

You'll also need to file a case conference brief with facts and an offer to settle. (form 17) as well as confirmation to the hearing dates and other forms associated with it which if your a respondent you'll hav... access page ...

You'll need to provide all your financial stamens via Ontario court forms.

You'll also need to file a case conference brief with facts and an offer to settle. (form 17) as well as confirmation to the hearing dates and other forms associated with it which if your a respondent you'll have 5 days prior to the court date

If you've been served by your opposition with an "application" "form 8" also paired forms you'll need to also file an answer form also found on Ontario court forms as well as a form called affidavit in support of custody and access.

With all of this is may be wise to also file an affidavit form 14 A in support of your position

Here's a short version of what I'm going through. 12 years ago I fell head over hills for a woman who had 4 wonderful children which to this day I feel that they are mine. Anyway, we ended up having a beautiful baby boy together and at first she was the one working and I took care of our babies b... access page ...

Here's a short version of what I'm going through. 12 years ago I fell head over hills for a woman who had 4 wonderful children which to this day I feel that they are mine. Anyway, we ended up having a beautiful baby boy together and at first she was the one working and I took care of our babies because I was injured. We talked and as soon as I was able to I found a good job which then allowed her to be a stay at home mom.


Worst part of my job was it took me away for long periods of time. It's been that way for the last 10 yesrs. I wanted to be home and be a part of doing the everyday things all along. So last year I finally just had enough of missing my family and quit my job. But when I got back she just left me broken hearted and told the 4 older kids I helped raise and took care of that they are to never have anything to do with me again and has kept our son from me even after a court order. As well as our son speaking up and saying that he wants to live with me.

I'm also finding that all she really wanted was money and a free ride through life. I can honestly say she has never kept her word but has taken myself and others for granted. I have no problem with taking care of my kids and doing what's right for them. Is there anything I can do to stop her craziness and to just be a loving father like I have always been?

Judge Zucker gets slap on the wrist for tampering with transcripts. Lawyer James Lockyer says he has concerns "about whether people are being convicted of crimes they didn’t commit” because a judge appears to be biased. 

Regarding the issues on transcript errors by cou... access page ...

Judge Zucker gets slap on the wrist for tampering with transcripts. Lawyer James Lockyer says he has concerns "about whether people are being convicted of crimes they didn’t commit” because a judge appears to be biased. 

Regarding the issues on transcript errors by court reporters and recordings 

thestar.com/news/gta/


QUOTE: "Court reporters are very accurate. You do have a right to review the transcript and alert the court reporter within 30 days after it was issued as to any errors.

Most witnesses waive this right on the record during the deposition because court reporters rarely make mistakes.

I once had a client who reviewed her deposition (in an employment case) and insisted that there were numerous errors and insisted that something be done about it. I was perturbed with my client because I trusted the court reporter more than my client's memory. I contacted the reporter and she was gracious enough to let my client listen to the tape recording of the deposition (we were within our 30 days).

My client found no errors after listening to the tapes. If it is past the time for you to send corrections to the court reporter, it would do you no good to listen tapes because you cannot make changes or issue an "errata" sheet to show portions you disagree with."

http://www.lawqa.com/qa/court-reporters


Lawyers don't want to accuse judges because they can be punished:

http://health-boundaries-bite.com/Tampering-with-Transcripts.html

Its not impossible to catch a judge however:

Judge Zucker gets slap on the wrist for tampering with transcripts

see the Toronto sun article found at the Canada Court Watch Site

canadacourtwatch.com/Newpaper-JudgeZukerGetsASlapOnWrist.pdf


Section 139 (1) of the Criminal Code as stated:

139. (1) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding, is guilty of:

(c) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(d) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

thestar.com/news/

thestar.com/news/gta//brenda_waudby_officially_innocent_of_child_abuse.html

And making matters worse, a typo in the court transcript of the babysitter’s confession wrongly said the force of his blows to Jenna’s body “wouldn’t have” have broken her ribs. In fact, when Waudby’s lawyer Julie Kirkpatrick heard a tape of the confession, he said they “would” have.

That error in court record has been fixed. And now so has a much greater one.

Waudby should have been treated as a victim not a perpetrator, said Fuerst.

The wrongful conviction meant years of isolation, depression and public humiliation for Waudby, with even her eldest daughter doubting her innocence at one point, Fuerst said.

Their insistence relied on a transcript of the babysitter’s confession that although he made “good solid jabs” to the girl’s stomach, his punches “wouldn’t have been enough force to break ribs.” The Crown’s conclusion: Waudby beat her toddler.

But Waudby and her dogged lawyer, Julie Kirkpatrick, knew that wasn’t true. But they couldn’t get their hands on the tape of the confession until she filed an appeal and received the evidence in disclosure.

J.D. actually said the exact opposite: his blows “would have had enough force to break ribs.” The court reporter had reported it incorrectly.

Ok a few years back . My baby mother had another child and said it was not mine . No tests done but the child looks identical to my 3 other daughters. Now the mother had had the child apprehended by c.a.s. and apparently fostered out. Is there a way to get my child out of foster care to bring her... access page ...

Ok a few years back . My baby mother had another child and said it was not mine . No tests done but the child looks identical to my 3 other daughters. Now the mother had had the child apprehended by c.a.s. and apparently fostered out. Is there a way to get my child out of foster care to bring her home.???

Contact Location: Ontario Canada

Yes 100% why didn't his acclaimed "girlfriend on here Carolyn" go to him on Canada day if she was his partner???? Why did he go drinking for 3 days?? Why was he living alone if this women is staying she is the step mother lol? Interesting the women who wrote this also forgot she betrayed her dear... access page ...

Yes 100% why didn't his acclaimed "girlfriend on here Carolyn" go to him on Canada day if she was his partner???? Why did he go drinking for 3 days?? Why was he living alone if this women is staying she is the step mother lol? Interesting the women who wrote this also forgot she betrayed her dear friend who welcomed her into this family's home and this women who wrote this was not kind to this mother. She's forgot to many truthful facts it is sick. Everyone in Nelson saw this father all the time with his child. The women who wrote this has left out the truth. Period. I am Writing this on behalf of the Mother. This is the worst to do to anyone.

Does anyone have to deal with a Narcissist ex that can't tell the truth? The ex went on a vacation with her latest victim ( calls him fiancé, they known each other 4 months). ... access page ...

Does anyone have to deal with a Narcissist ex that can't tell the truth? The ex went on a vacation with her latest victim ( calls him fiancé, they known each other 4 months). She asked me to care for our son for 9 days ( just two weeks after she went away for work for 3 months) I ask if you want to give an emergency contact, she says she is just going out to eastern Canada. I ask "you sure"? She responds why would I lie? So she comes back, I look on her Facebook and there is a picture of Mexico. I ask her about it and she responded, " beautiful isn't it"? I respond " I'm sure the judge will think it is." So the other question I have is that originally we were supposed to start 50/50 1 May but since she has been gone for 3 months previously she wanted more time with our son. I have a trial for retro cs, will the judge see that she didn't want 50/50 til June so she could collect one last cs cheque?

If a person makes the conscious choice to cause a long term separation between a child and a loving parent; even reunited, that priceless time cannot ever be replaced. 
Old tears can’t be dried.
Fists stepping stones cannot be revisited or walked together.
Missed Birth... access page ...

If a person makes the conscious choice to cause a long term separation between a child and a loving parent; even reunited, that priceless time cannot ever be replaced. 
Old tears can’t be dried.
Fists stepping stones cannot be revisited or walked together.
Missed Birthdays, Holidays and Special events will not happen again.
There is a gap of time that is permanently erased, memories that were never made.
So if you have worked hard to be a part of your child’s life and been denied time after time…
And if you have been cut off at every pass no matter how long or how hard you have tried…
When and if a parent does finally prevail in a long battle that they should never have had to fight…
When finally in the rare case that parents and children finally reunite , all that can be done is to build a bridge ; because that gap will always otherwise be in the way to reaching the other side.
The most righteous of anger is that of an Alienated or better put “Extracted” Parent who cannot go back in time and be there with their children when it matted and kiss the boo boo’s , teach them well and properly, protect them from harm, be there when they were needed the most, wipe the tears, help them to bloom rather than wilt, show them love rather than hate, guide them thought the stages of life with a tender yet firm hand, commend them when they excelled, assist them when they faltered, hold them close when they were fearful, guide them in the right direction if they start to go astray, praise them when they did the right thing, discipline them when they needed and give them wings when they needed to fly rather than clip them or allow them to live in a world of grey….. Opportunity was taken away.

If a parent is lucky they will eventually get a judge, perhaps a black robed angel that will see though the smoke screen and do what is right.
Perhaps they will dole out a punishment that is fitting for this tremendous crime or perhaps there will be just an end to the years of control and abuse and the custodial privilege will finally be stripped from the person who has stolen all of this and done so much damage…
No jail time, restitution, loss of parenting privilege could be enough to punish this crime as the loss of a living child is something for which there can be no truly man made given punishment or adequate sentence. The parents and children have already paid the highest and most unfathomable price and there are no refunds at the end of the day.
Your honor, with all due respect; all these parents want is “Emotional Severance Pay”.
If ever you have had to endure this inexplicable pain, you understand the irony of what I say.

S.Lombard-Elmore ©

I'm in need of advice and if there is any local support groups in my area.
I need to keep the city and certain details out of the public because if my ex finds out it will cause serious issues for my kids. If someone proof reading this knows where a support group is that info would be best ... access page ...

I'm in need of advice and if there is any local support groups in my area.
I need to keep the city and certain details out of the public because if my ex finds out it will cause serious issues for my kids. If someone proof reading this knows where a support group is that info would be best emailed to me. The public part I will write below as I need to see if there is any holes and dangers I should be aware of.

Please keep in mind my end goal is that my children get to have a healthy relationship with their mother.

My children (11yr and 9yr) asked me last summer why things are the way they are, which I gave them the stereotypical response. They asked if we could do a 50/50 where they stay for 2 weeks at a time with us, I said I would try but would probably involve going to court if you two want to go through that. They said yes. As time passed and the abuse/neglect got worse they came to me the weekend before Halloween saying they didn't want to do the 50/50 but live with me full-time until mommy gets help and treats them better, and then they want to do 50/50.

We have not been to court for anything so my plans were to file for custody with my address as their residency with a motion for access to speed up the process of them seeing their mother. They don't trust their mother to let them come back after I have served her and I don't blame them since they're not blind when she kept them from me when she was mad. I plan to file for a OCL and hope to get my children the best life they deserve. My children want me to have full control over their lives so if they're mother stops receiving help and resorts back to her old behaviors they can just go back to visiting on the weekends. What forms do I need and what's the best route for this result? Do I bring up her mental health? Can I file for divorce without doing a child agreement as I'm scared she'll make my life as miserable as possible through the splitting of assets.


Thank you for your help and hopefully she can't figure out who this is.









Contact Location: Cambridge, Ontario Canada