I need some advice-helping son with court proceedings. My son has been fighting for fair access and child support for over a year and a half now. He was making progress and was reasonably happy with everything but all orders were always temporary and the judge that was pretty good retired. The ne... access page ...

I need some advice-helping son with court proceedings. My son has been fighting for fair access and child support for over a year and a half now. He was making progress and was reasonably happy with everything but all orders were always temporary and the judge that was pretty good retired. The new judge is female and has really changed things up and doubled his child support based on imputed income which he is appealing. Where the problem comes is that in thes pre-trial hearings his ex’s attorney puts “without prejudice” on everything and their offers to compromise are nothing at all. Their offers have only been $200 a month and go away and then no support and go away. This is not good faith negotiations. Now his ex who has legal aid has a motion before the court for my son to pay her legal bills. This is ridiculous. Since “good faith” is supposed to be used in “without prejudice” can my son expose these offers to the court? The only offer every made months and months ago was for supervised visits. The previous judge I think had an idea some garbage was going on but this new judge is preparing to make a ruling at the end of January and it’s insane for him to pay one dime of her legal fees when she’s the one dragging everything out trying to get my son to just go away. Help

Contact Location: Canada

because of govt of ON ugliness and abject lack of support for families attacked by the CA$ filth, here's the type of communicating and work that can be required of people re: supporting those whose children (in this case a four month old baby) have been CA$ baby snatched. the amount of legal writ... access page ...

because of govt of ON ugliness and abject lack of support for families attacked by the CA$ filth, here's the type of communicating and work that can be required of people re: supporting those whose children (in this case a four month old baby) have been CA$ baby snatched. the amount of legal writing which this grandmother and family have to complete, get sworn, filed and served (lol brutal) over the next couple of days prior to next week's Tuesday "Child Protection Application Hearing" in Toronto is brutal. this grandmother's family was attacked because she was utlizing the complaints processes in place to fight back against the CA$'s actions against her family. she got her own children back a couple of years ago, became political at some point and started to admin. law fight back. she ahd some success so the CA$ just this past week apprehended her grandchild=brutally common CA$ retaliation.

when is the first court appearance on the recent apprehension? how old is the child that was taken? are the parents together? is it the TO CA$?

(grandmother)
Toronto CAS, baby 4mths , court tuesday. Parents not together

have you ever written an affidavit for court? do you know the duty counsels at the TO courthouse?

(grandmother)
yes. ty....Today

ok so you understand the importance of having affidavit material in for the first court appearance?

here is the immediate return of the child section from the CFSA SECTION 51 (2) (a0 and (c);
e-laws.gov.on.ca/elaws_statutes_90c11_e.htm

51. (1) The court shall not adjourn a hearing for more than thirty days,...
Custody during adjournment

(2) Where a hearing is adjourned, the court shall make a temporary order for care and custody providing that the child,

(a) remain in or be returned to the care and custody of the person who had charge of the child immediately before intervention under this Part;...

(c) be placed in the care and custody of a person other than the person referred to in clause (a), with the consent of that other person, subject to the society’s supervision and on such reasonable terms and conditions as the court considers appropriate; or.

so you can argue best interests of the child=child immediately returned with no CA$ involvement or at the very least returned to mom/family under CA$ supervision order..many people have successfully done this previously

here is a listing of 10 or so cases where that happened previously:

fixcas.com/help/shelter.htm (404 error, dead link)

google.ca/search?q=fixcas.com/help/shelter.htm

read them. according to the info in the judgies' written judgments: some of these parents were incredibly compromised but got their kids back anyways.you need to print at least three of these ("three witnesses at law") cases off and attach them to your affidavit material as exhibits. also need to identify them and briefly explain them/the relevance to your case in your affidavit

Case Law for Motions for the Immediate Return of the Child(ren) 

a big argument in your case will be best interest of the child is significantly heighten by the important issue of mother-baby bonding. study after study has shown that healthy development of babies requires that parent-baby bonding, those hours and hours/month when parents, mothers and fathers, and babies just quietly are together looking into each others faces=incredibly important for the healthy development of the baby

if you really want to hammer the case get onto Google Scholar and find some academic reports re: the importance of baby-mother bonding. remember to always focus the argument on baby's best interests. they could care less of mom (your daughter) and dad and family and if you even mention anything about the family hurting the judge will turn on you hard

so you have alot of work to do today to have something to bring into duty counsel first thing tomorrow (be the first in line waiting) to get duty counsel to go over and hopefully add to/improve what you've prepared (put your stuff on a USB stick). do you know where on-line to access the necessary court forms?