X

Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
X
August 11 2022

Re: Thats from my daughter who he brainwashed.
Lisa Michelle Weeks audience: Public
Oh hell don't take that to heart, I knw its easier said than done and it feels like you...
Lawyer FAQ How is custody and access decided
Hilary audience: Authenticated Login and access Lawyer FAQ  How is custody and access decided
Informative video. Toronto divorce lawyer Steven Benmor discusses the question How is ...
Until Six Nations finishes developing its own approved agency
Chris Carter audience: Authenticated Login and access Until Six Nations finishes developing its own approved agency
Congratulations to Brandi Martin and the others who worked hard to kick the Brantford C...
I dont necessarily trust Viaguard as I suspect Ben Salsberg has been hired by Motherisk
Lillian Christine Sorko audience: Authenticated Login and access I dont necessarily trust Viaguard as I suspect Ben Salsberg has been hired by Motherisk
Do you think families are being steared away from harmedbymotherisk.com & lawyer fi...
Audio recording phone conversation Chris York May 25 2018 re Kody Smart re Jaclyn Matthews
Chris York audience: Authenticated Login and access Audio recording phone conversation Chris York May 25 2018 re Kody Smart re Jaclyn Matthews
re So here's my theory by Jaclyn Matthews, Phone conversation from May 25 2018 950 PM O...
Navigation

Authors & content contributions
Categories
Groups
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 12050 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


Parents

To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Advocacy Canada
Using Children as Pawns in Divorce this are narcissistic tendencies by the alienating culprit
Paula Lovgren Lorraine Grenier
audience: Public

Narcissistic parents will often seek custody of children during a divorce even if previ...
Re: She feels that she can do this with no regard for our court order
Blair Dunbar
audience: Public

No she can't just move. ESPECIALLY if you have a court order specifying access schedule...
Re: Re: Email to lawyer that Legal aid let me have for one case conference out of 3 years of court and case conferences
Vincent
audience: Authenticated Login and access Re: Re: Email to lawyer that Legal aid let me have for one case conference out of 3 years of court and case conferences

that is ok I will clean it up .. why don't you sign up as member and you will have opti...
Re: How to APPEAL in Family Court to Superior Court
Kieren
audience: Public

  Motions for Security for Costs Ontario Bar Association Litigat...
Bill 88 CFSA to raise the age of protection to allow 16 and 17 year old child welfare / Children's Aid Society
Lee Bolton
audience: Authenticated Login and access Bill 88 CFSA to raise the age of protection to allow 16 and 17 year old child welfare / Children's Aid Society

Check out this crock of Sh*t! Children's Aid Society trying to be able to apprehend 16 ...
Elderly alienated German Oma granted access in Canadian Family Court opposed by vexatious parent
Murdering Parent Suzanne Olsen
audience: Public

Another alienating vexatious mother Christina <a href="../PinWall?page=1&amp;page_limit...
Re: Brockville FACS website breech - ALLEGED ONTARIO CAS HACKER TRAIL UPDATE
Kelley and Derek.com
audience: Public

NEW APRIL 2019 TRIAL DATE NOW IN DOUBT AS CREDIBILITY OF FCSLLG'S PRIVATE INTERNET SECU...
PETITION: Stop the Manitoba Government from implementing unfair changes in child support laws.
Colin Wright
audience: Public

The Manitoba government has proposed reforming&nbsp;Manitoba&rsquo;s laws governing enf...
Re: Zdenek Hanzlik died after setting himself alight had been protesting Family Court issues
Jerry Troiana
audience: Public

When Buddhist Monks did this in Vietnam, in the 60's, it drew international attention t...
Crown wards to apply for compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board or to file personal injury claims
Jesse Larabee
audience: Authenticated Login and access Crown wards to apply for compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board or to file personal injury claims

If you are a former crown ward, you are encouraged to please get help and write down al...
brainsyntax.com

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member

X

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Monday, May 19, 2014 - FamilyCourt - Jeremy Swanson - Fathers in action group

I have long wondered as to why all the family courts not only in Canada, but the UK, New Zealand and Australia, independently come to the same conclusion independently, that fathers are an unnecessary burden on a child after the mother deems it so? and as her word in any of the above country's is worth twice that of the father, as any father knows if he is in court he might as well recite nursery rhymes.

After being in court in three of the country's  mentioned in unfamily court, I have to say I personally believe there has been a conspiracy by the judiciary for this to occur,  that may be backed up by the statements of Justice Colridge, " Lord Thomas issued a warning say Sir Paul had brought the judiciary into disrepute with his views."  so old lord Tom is saying that justice Coleridge has to follow the general line of consensus that all the other judges have agreed upon?

This is also relative in Canada as there is a supreme court ruling by Chief Justice Dickson, see below, stating that judges are supposed to think independently, and not collectively as pedantic mooron's.

The courts website where this was taken from has long since been removed, again part of their conspiracy.

 

Chief justice Dickson

 http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.asp <http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.asp

 

Chief Justice Dickson of the Supreme Court of Canada gave a useful description of judicial independence in an important case.5 <http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.htm#en05>  He wrote:

The role of the courts as resolver of disputes, interpreter of the law and defender of the Constitution requires that they be completely separate in authority and function from all other participants in the justice system. The principle of judicial independence has been the complete liberty of individual judges to hear and decide the cases that come before them; no outsider  be it government, pressure group, individual or even another judge  should interfere in fact, or attempt to interfere, with the way in which a judge conducts his or her case and makes his or her decision.

http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1996/1996scc113.html <http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1996/1996scc113.html>

  

I believe they conspired to have consensus amongst  the judiciaries of the above country's at this conference

 

BATH WORLD CONGRESS ON FAMILY LAW – SEPTEMBER 2001 NOTES ON THE CONFERENCE:

 

http://www.dottal.org/LBDUK/bath%202001.htm 

 

You should recognize many names

Here is an article  where a judge has been chastised and effectively fired for stating what I have explained above

 

High Court judge who spoke out in favour of marriage says he would have been 'publicly hanged' if he had spoken out again <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

image <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

High Court judge who spoke out in favour of marriage say... <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

Sir Paul Coleridge, pictured, defended the right of judges to voice their private opinions on issues they believed were of national importance.

View on www.dailymail.co.uk <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

 

A High Court judge who stepped down after being disciplined for campaigning in favour of marriage said he would have been ‘publicly hanged’ if he had spoken out again.

Sir Paul Coleridge launched a stinging attack against Lord Thomas, the country’s most senior judge, for rebuking him after he repeatedly spoke out about the harm that family breakdowns caused children.

 

He said the judiciary had been ‘brought into disrepute’ by investigating him for backing a traditional view of marriage.

Sir Paul, Britain’s top divorce judge, was given a formal warning by the Lord Chief Justice and Justice Secretary Chris Grayling for judicial misconduct, prompting him to hand in his resignation.

Yesterday he hit back to defend the right of judges to voice their private opinions on issues they believed were of national importance.

He said the way he had been treated proved the senior judiciary was ‘terrified of mild criticism’ and ‘trivial’ complaints by a few members of the public.

Sir Paul set up the Marriage Foundation think tank in May 2012 to champion the institution on a national basis and promote ‘healthy, stable relationships’.

The Office for Judicial Complaints, the body that polices the behaviour of judges, advised Sir Paul to take a lower profile after he protested about the devastating impact of family break-up on children, criticised cohabitation, and called for greater support for marriage.

But in December that year he gave an interview which appeared to criticise the government for focussing too much on the issue of gay marriage.

It attracted 10 complaints and an inquiry found his speeches and newspaper articles were ‘incompatible with his judicial responsibilities’.

 

 

Lord Thomas issued a warning say Sir Paul had brought the judiciary into disrepute with his views. When he complained that this was ‘unfair and disproportionate’, he received another reprimand.

He said: ‘I thought it was completely ridiculous.

 

'Every time I said anything, a member of the public wrote in and I found the whole enormous panoply of the judicial complaints organisation just grinding on. I mean, where do we go after a reprimand? Public hanging?’

 

Sir Paul, who has heard some of the UK’s highest-profile divorce cases, including that of Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, said the senior judiciary was ‘risk averse to the point of being frightened of our own shadow.’

 

He said: ‘He [Lord Thomas] is the one who should have put a stop to it. He thinks I’m the one who brought the judiciary into disrepute. I’m not sure about that.

‘Allowing this to get out of hand has done us [the senior judiciary] no good at all. I think I said to him in a letter this whole affair brings the judiciary into disrepute.

'It makes us look stupid. It makes us look risk averse to the point of being ridiculous when half a dozen members of the public can provoke this kind of storm. It should not be allowed to happen.’

 

Sir Paul, 64, officially retired from the High Court’s family division last month but is continuing to sit as a judge while he finishes hearing three divorce cases.

He set up the Marriage Foundation to research the consequences of family breakdown on children, which he says is increased risk of indiscipline in schools, drug-taking, behavioural problems, gang violence, poor mental health, lack of achievement in exams and failure in the job market.

 

He said the ‘epidemic’ was damaging the lives of millions of children, with some 3.8million caught up in the family justice system.

He said: ‘I am not saying that every broken family produces dysfunctional children but almost every dysfunctional child is the product of a broken family.

 

‘Separation of parents may be good for the parents. It is never, never, never good for the children.’

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said: ‘The office plays an important role in maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. It is a statutory body through which the lord chancellor and lord chief justice investigate judges and magistrates under regulations passed by parliament.’

It’s the NATIONAL JUDICIAL INSTITUTE

Reply Count
2
last update
Monday, May 19, 2014
legal disclaimer
Audience
Public
Add new
---
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel
Download PDF
Contact
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
2 replies

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Lawyers | Fathers in action group Voice Audience: Public

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Lawyers | Rick Voice Audience: Public

Jeremy


Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
X
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: