X

Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
X
September 29 2022

There is NO reason to hit a woman!
audience: Authenticated Login and access There is NO reason to hit a woman!
What he describes in this b...
physical abuse my infant grand son experienced in foster homes before he was 7 months old
Mary Najdzion Gagnon audience: Public
My family was involved with CAS for over 4 years...as a result, my son, my grand daught...
Re: I will make sure I point a gun to my self and she wont receive a penny
Sa Sing audience: Public
No offense ladies but I've had enough of negative male photos and of negative narrative an...
Response to Andrew Scheer
audience: Public
My response to Scheer Good morning, After careful consideratio...
Re: Financial gag unless my son comes up with over $100,000 to bring a motion to the courts
Brian Kendall audience: Public
2 years since I have seen my special needs son, I helped him win a CBC Future 40 Under ...
Navigation

Authors & content contributions
Categories
Groups
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 12050 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


Parents

To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Advocacy Canada
Mr.
1
audience: Public

20
Re: Father Rights Canada / Direction needed on support and 5050 issues
Suzanne Stack Gignac
audience: Public

I believe the court will take into consideration the status quo. Be preemptive, take he...
Father Rights Canada / title to be edited
Not disclosed
audience: Authenticated Login and access Father Rights Canada / title to be edited

Hi I have recently gotten dna test for my son and found out I am not the biological father...
Father Rights Canada / title to be edited
Steve
audience: Authenticated Login and access Father Rights Canada / title to be edited

FR[Fathers Rights] Canada network contact request recorded : <a href="http://www.brains...
July-30-2007 Steven Olsen to Christina Jane Olsen
Steven Olsen Christina J. Olsen
audience: Public

Steve Olsen July-30-07 4:35:43 PM &gt;I have been thinking so many d...
Symptoms of a Pathological Liar

audience: Public

A pathological liar can go on telling endless lies about...
Shawn Edward Wiegand malicious calls to the Children's Aid office to revenge on his enemies
Shawn Edward Wiegand
audience: Authenticated Login and access Shawn Edward Wiegand malicious calls to the Children's Aid office to revenge on his enemies

April you did not write the top comment, the first one is from him and I wrote the repl...
Re: Re: Common-law is an unwise choice / I have been in a Common law relationship
Silvano Delrio
audience: Public

Actually, in 2019 it's a great choice. All the more so if it is coupled with a prenup.
Father Rights Canada / information on legal rights on parents with disabilities
Not disclosed
audience: Authenticated Login and access Father Rights Canada / information on legal rights on parents with disabilities

Posting information on Legal right on parents with disabilities <br /...
Father Rights Canada / I work at Family Centre, a non profit, community organization in Lethbridge
Not disclosed
audience: Public

Hi, I am an engaged father and I work at Family Centre, a non-profit, community organiz...
brainsyntax.com

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member

X

The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience

Sunday, June 7, 2015 - AbusesToChildren - Glenn Cheriton

I write to you as a concerned parent about actions of the Federal Department of Justice (DOJ) which I believe are undermining a Supreme Court judgment, disadvantaging numerous children and insidiously damaging relationships between parents and children against the will of Parliament.

I specifically refer to the following page on the Government of Canada website:

justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/harmonization

This is a commentary on the Gordon v. Goertz Supreme Court ruling regarding custody and moveaways. The Justice Department has decided to turn that rather clear ruling on its head, by citing the losing opinion as if it were the law. L'Heureux-Dubé, writing for the minority, opined that the custodial parent has sole authority to decide the best interest of the child, and the noncustodial parent has to prove that a move would not be in the child's best interest.

By law, that interpretation lost and was rejected by the majority of the Court.

The Justice Department gives about 600 words to the minority, and about 50 words to the majority ruling. How will most ordinary citizens understand this? How will lower court judges? Lawyers? Has DOJ promoted this misleading, inaccurate, and unacceptable view to judges through judicial training?

Parents have complained to me that judges have cited the minority opinion, as the DOJ does above, in reasons for ruling against their continued parenting in moveaway cases.

The Supreme Court ruling puts the best interests of the child ahead of the moveaway parent “rights”. Social science is clear that both parents parenting produces the best outcomes for children.

DoJ spreads this disinformation and causes disadvantage and suffering for children and parents.

Even the Canadian Bar Association agrees that the best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience, “rights” and wishes of one parent.

The DOJ also interprets that “custody” is not a controversial concept, directly contrary to the clear recommendations and position of the 1998 Joint Senate Commons committee on child custody, which recommended replacing the term. I interpret the actions of the DOJ as a direct contradiction of Parliament. Do you feel that unelected bureaucrats should be contradicting the clearly expressed will of Parliamentarians and undermining the Supreme Court and due process of law?

I ask you, if you agree, to write to the Minister of Justice and respectfully request that he order his department to rewrite this page to reflect the decision of the Supreme Court and remove the opinion of the minority, which failed.
The millions of middle class parents, who do not have the money to refight the arbitrary decisions of those who are undermining the Supreme Court, will thank you. I thank you for your attention to this important issue.


Mr. Glenn Cheriton
Ottawa, ON 


last update
Sunday, June 7, 2015
legal disclaimer
Audience
Public
Add new
---
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience
Download PDF
Contact
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
0 replies
Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
X
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: