X

Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
X
January 24 2021

My 30 year old CAS file - 100 years of child abuse the Society has knowingly hidden
Kieren audience: Public
30 years ago I was removed from my abusive mother Lorrainne Maich and placed in foster ...
Fight this abusive divorce process which uses our children as pawns for judicial extortion
Barbara Lapointe audience: Authenticated Login and access Fight this abusive divorce process which uses our children as pawns for judicial extortion
Contact details: I wish to contact Chris Marshall to learn more about Jane Hoffman.<br ...
All 3 Judges made malicious comments towards Mr. Booth and made wreckless endorsements against the family
Kristoffer Booth audience: Authenticated Login and access All 3 Judges made malicious comments towards Mr. Booth and made wreckless endorsements against the family
As you can see Sharlene wrote notes to her lawyer and society yet they lied in every on...
Real Woman respect Fathers Rights
Elizabeth Turner audience: Public
Bravo.....I'm so glad to see that there are women of many different generations saying ...
Spiteful Ex and in-laws doing nothing to facilitate a relationship with my child
Steve Schauland audience: Authenticated Login and access Spiteful Ex and in-laws doing nothing to facilitate a relationship with my child
Check out the civil suit brought on by a son against a mother for this exact kind of no...
Navigation

Authors & content contributions
Categories
Groups
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 12050 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


Parents

To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Advocacy Canada
Class A regarding Motherisk drug testing for Child Custody and Criminal Cases November 2015
Lillian Christine Sorko
audience: Public

You may not know that you have been a victim of motherisk. Many other labs have taken h...
Re: Father Rights Canada / last time she left was from Alberta to Ontario
Adam Wiebe
audience: Public

If you write something up with your ex and sign it, it&rsquo;s now a legally binding do...
Father Rights Canada / I need recommendations for a great male family lawyer who is Jewish
Not disclosed
audience: Public

Please I want to be anonymous. Hello everyone. <b...
Father Rights Canada / Manitoba father concerned about CFS
Not disclosed
audience: Public

Hi my name is Will Boon, my better half, Chantelle and I are about to have a little boy, s...
Fathers Rights Canada - Martial arts instructor seduced him and a child resulted
Not disclosed
audience: Public

Not sure if I should speak out fully other than this brief. My son was physically &amp;...
notes OCL Disclosure Meeting

audience: Authenticated Login and access notes OCL Disclosure Meeting

The OCL Ontario Children's Lawyer announced today in the disclosure meeting that the mo...
You all dont know squat what's in the best interest of any child
Keith Marsolek
audience: Public

Well, it is looking like I missed both my sons birthdays and I will not be allowed to h...
Re Anyone know if it matters for having a male or female lawyer
Alysen Cameron
audience: Public

It's more than just male vs female. It's how judges and lawyers are personally connecte...
Re: Father Rights Canada / Father not healthy needs support
Oldrich Schmuttermeier Jr.
audience: Public

Sell your car and buy a cheap one for $700 or 800 register it into a friends name tell her...
Re Accordingly to mom teaching work values to their children is not appropriated
Jim Bailey
audience: Public

Says it all - Fathers/Men-Tors have little say in Kids lies - NEVER pay so called Child...
brainsyntax.com

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member

X

Children's Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children

Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - CAS - Jeff Stapleford - CAS Ontario~My Experience

CAS profited from the exploitation of my children


Please use my case above as reference. CFSRB even listed the case law within mine to justify siding with us parents. In my case CAS still withheld documentation and lied. They lost again and now they are refusing to provide answers despite being ordered. So I have put it back in the lap of CFSRB and said...well now what?


I have asked them to waive confidentiality so the entirety of everything may be published to expose the manipulation. In my case CAS aided and abetted my ex in an International Child abduction and covered it up and did not follow the rules. Then once everything was in place they worked with her to take away my rights which prompted a 3.5 year legal battle to restore my rights and force Canada to Acknowledge the originating US jurisdiction. I had to get a written letter from the Ontario Central Authority acknowledging my US divorce order thereby proving all actions were illegal as my joint consent was ignored. So trust me. I want them exposed as badly


Canada uses another term. An accessory. So an example. Since CAS and my ex wife profited from the exploitation of my American Children by violating international law. My ex is the violator of human trafficking but the accessory to the crime the CAS is equally
As culpable under the Criminal Code of Canada

In response to my last CFSRB can you believe that the CAS had the audacity to claim that they have no obligation to inform my American children of their rights but only have to follow the child protection standards of Ontario.

 The standards first of all are a guideline and no law. The UN Charter of Children's rights is a ratified treaty just like the Vienna convention. Which CAS acknowledges per case law. So my solution. File a lawsuit in US Federal Court and let CAS explain to a Federal judge why they are violating the rights of Americans.


Then CAS says well mom consented. Oops well when the cops go to talk to the kids they did not get consent....and violated once again the UN Charter of Children's rights. Keep in mind The government is a legal third parent to all kids in Canada. That is how CAS gets away with this due to their mandate. Where they messed up is not observing my American children's rights and I already had a court order which the Central Authority retroactively Recognized. Making all of it illegal.


- - - 

INTRODUCTION

[1]        J. S., the Applicant (the “Applicant”), filed an Application pursuant to section 68(5)  of the Child and Family Services Act, R.S.O., 1990, c.C.11, as amended, (the “Act”) on October 3, 2014. The application was in regards to the Internal Complaints Review Panel (the “ICRP”) processes conducted by the Sarnia-Lambton Children’s Aid Society (the “Society”) during the year 2014, and the outcome of these ICRPs. 

 

[2]        As a result of the Pre-Hearing held on November 14, 2014, the Board determined that the issues to be heard at the hearing would focus on the ICRP process pursuant to section 68(5) of the Act.  As well, the hearing would review whether the Society has heard the Applicant and provided him with reasons for decisions for certain issues that were not dealt with satisfactorily at the ICRP, pursuant to section 68.1(4) 4 and 5, as follows:

 

  • Complaint A: that the Society did not follow the appropriate time frames with regards to the two ICRPs held so far;
  • Complaint B: that the Society is not properly providing access visits to which the Applicant is entitled;
  • Complaint C: that until very recently, the Applicant was prohibited from attending his children’s sporting events during his access visits;
  • Complaint D: that in the communication with Society staff, they are not interested in hearing the Applicant’s views on issues of significance, and that reasons are seldom provided;
  • Complaint E: that the Society refuses to provide the Applicant with disclosure of the contents of his file.

 

[3]        A hearing of these matters was held on December 4 and 5, 2014. The applicant was not represented by legal counsel.

           

[4]        The Board’s reasons for this decision and its orders follow.


Full Source:
canlii.org/en/on2/2015cfsrb52.htm



- - - -  2 - -

Indexed as:              J.S. v. Sarnia-Lambton Children’s Aid Society

(CFSA s.68)

 

INTRODUCTION

[1]        J. S., the Applicant (the “Applicant”), filed an Application pursuant to section 68(5) of the Child and Family Services Act, R.S.O., 1990, c.C.11, as amended, (the “Act”) on June 29, 2015. The Application was in regards to the Internal Complaints Review Panel (the “ICRP”) process conducted by the Sarnia-Lambton Children’s Aid Society (the “Society”) on May 27, 2015 and the summary of the ICRP outlined in a letter dated June 12, 2015. 

 

[2]        Following the Pre-Hearing teleconference held on September 8, 2015, the Board determined that the issues to be decided were whether the Society heard the Applicant and provided him with reasons about the following concerns all of which had been raised in the ICRP:

 

A)   Supervised Access – why supervised when court and voice recordings from Society workers said unsupervised;

B)  Official explanation of redacted copy of emails;

C)    Children’s rights violated;

D)   File disclosures;

E)   December 9, 2013 supervision note stated we would encourage the mother to get custody of the children and the Applicant would be the access parent;

F)   Society’s obligation to advise the Applicant’s children of their rights as [Country] citizens;

G)   Delay in SKYPE visits with his children;

H)   Email contact with Society terminated; Society never used the 1-800 number that was established for contact purposes;

I)     Access visit for December 31, 2014 to January 1, 2015.

 

 

[3]        The hearing was held on October 27, 2015. The Applicant was not represented by legal counsel.

           

[4]        The Board’s reasons for this decision and its orders follow.


Full Source:
canlii.org/en/on/cm5pYQAAAAAB

CAS
Group
- CAS Ontario~My Experience
Reply Count
1
last update
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
legal disclaimer
Audience
Public
Add new
---
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document Children's Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children
Download PDF
Contact
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: Children's Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: Children's Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: Children's Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
1 replies

Childrens Aid Society of Ontario profited from the exploitation of my children

AntiFather | Ally B Voice Page created 2/21/2016 9:12:59 AM Audience: Public


Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
X
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: